The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated Derivation of the Adjoint of High-Level Transient Finite Element Programs
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we demonstrate a new technique for deriving discrete adjoint and tangent linear models of a finite element model. The technique is significantly more efficient and automatic than standard algorithmic differentiation techniques. The approach relies on a high-level symbolic representation of the forward problem. In contrast to developing a model directly in Fortran or C++, high-level systems allow the developer to express the variational problems to be solved in near-mathematical notation. As such, these systems have a key advantage: since the mathematical structure of the problem is preserved, they are more amenable to automated analysis and manipulation. The framework introduced here is implemented in a freely available software package named dolfin-adjoint, based on the FEniCS Project. Our approach to automated adjoint derivation relies on run-time annotation of the temporal structure of the model and employs the FEniCS finite element form compiler to automatically generate the low-level code for the derived models. This approach requires only trivial changes to a large class of forward models, including complicated time-dependent nonlinear models. The adjoint model automatically employs optimal checkpointing schemes to mitigate storage requirements for nonlinear models, without any user management or intervention. Furthermore, both the tangent linear and adjoint models naturally work in parallel, without any need to differentiate through calls to MPI or to parse OpenMP directives. The generality, applicability, and efficiency of the approach are demonstrated with examples from a wide range of scientific applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DOLFIN: Automated finite element computing
Logg, A., & Wells, G. N. (2010) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/1731022.1731030 · Cited by 750
Cited by
Neural ordinary differential equations
Chen, R. T. Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., & Duvenaud, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.07366 · Cited by 2,097
Firedrake: Automating the Finite Element Method by Composing Abstractions
Rathgeber, F., Ham, D. A., Mitchell, L., Lange, M., Luporini, F., Mcrae, A. T. T., Bercea, G.-T., Markall, G. R., & Kelly, P. H. J. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software · doi:10.1145/2998441 · Cited by 508
Self-citationEffective adjoint approaches for computational fluid dynamics
Kenway, G. K. W., Mader, C. A., He, P., & Martins, J. R. R. A. (2019) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.002 · Cited by 331
dolfin-adjoint 2018.1: automated adjoints for FEniCS and Firedrake
Mitusch, S., Funke, S., & Dokken, J. (2019) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.01292 · Cited by 208
Self-citationVinje, V., Zapf, B., Ringstad, G., Eide, P. K., Rognes, M. E., & Mardal, K.-A. (2023) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-023-00459-8 · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrell, P. E., Ham, D. A., Funke, S. W., & Rognes, M. E.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- C369-C393
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2057235791
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated Derivation of the Adjoint of High-Level Transient Finite Element Programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/120873558
- The paper
- Farrell, P. E., Ham, D. A., Funke, S. W., & Rognes, M. E. (2013). Automated Derivation of the Adjoint of High-Level Transient Finite Element Programs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/120873558
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.