The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimization of $\ell_{1-2}$ for Compressed Sensing
Abstract
We study minimization of the difference of $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ norms as a nonconvex and Lipschitz continuous metric for solving constrained and unconstrained compressed sensing problems. We establish exact (stable) sparse recovery results under a restricted isometry property (RIP) condition for the constrained problem, and a full-rank theorem of the sensing matrix restricted to the support of the sparse solution. We present an iterative method for $\ell_{1-2}$ minimization based on the difference of convex functions algorithm and prove that it converges to a stationary point satisfying the first-order optimality condition. We propose a sparsity oriented simulated annealing procedure with non-Gaussian random perturbation and prove the almost sure convergence of the combined algorithm (DCASA) to a global minimum. Computation examples on success rates of sparse solution recovery show that if the sensing matrix is ill-conditioned (non RIP satisfying), then our method is better than existing nonconvex compressed sensing solvers in the literature. Likewise in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phantom image recovery problem, $\ell_{1-2}$ succeeds with eight projections. Irrespective of the conditioning of the sensing matrix, $\ell_{1-2}$ is better than $\ell_1$ in both the sparse signal and the MRI phantom image recovery problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Optimization by Simulated Annealing
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4598.671 · Cited by 45,134
Donoho, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2006.871582 · Cited by 23,994
Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.
Geman, S., & Geman, D. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767596 · Cited by 17,949
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Donoho, D. L. (2004) · Cited by 16,703
Candes, E. J., Romberg, J., & Tao, T. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.862083 · Cited by 15,639
Boyd, S. (2010) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/9781601984616 · Cited by 12,677
A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems
Beck, A., & Teboulle, M. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080716542 · Cited by 11,952
Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit
Tropp, J. A., & Gilbert, A. C. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2007.909108 · Cited by 9,653
Cited by
DC programming and DCA: thirty years of developments
Le Thi, H. A., & Pham Dinh, T. (2018) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-018-1235-y · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Yin, P., Lou, Y., He, Q., & Xin, J.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- A536-A563
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2089106993
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 25.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimization of $\ell_{1-2}$ for Compressed Sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/140952363
- The paper
- Yin, P., Lou, Y., He, Q., & Xin, J. (2015). Minimization of $\ell_{1-2}$ for Compressed Sensing. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/140952363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.