Cited by 934Image and Signal Denoising MethodsNumerical methods in inverse problemsAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

The Little Engine That Could: Regularization by Denoising (RED)

Romano, Yaniv, Elad, Michael, Milanfar, Peyman·2017·SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences

Abstract

Removal of noise from an image is an extensively studied problem in image processing. Indeed, the recent advent of sophisticated and highly effective denoising algorithms has led some to believe that existing methods are touching the ceiling in terms of noise removal performance. Can we leverage this impressive achievement to treat other tasks in image processing? Recent work has answered this question positively, in the form of the Plug-and-Play Prior ($P^3$) method, showing that any inverse problem can be handled by sequentially applying image denoising steps. This relies heavily on the ADMM optimization technique in order to obtain this chained denoising interpretation. Is this the only way in which tasks in image processing can exploit the image denoising engine? In this paper we provide an alternative, more powerful, and more flexible framework for achieving the same goal. As opposed to the $P^3$ method, we offer Regularization by Denoising (RED): using the denoising engine in defining the regularization of the inverse problem. We propose an explicit image-adaptive Laplacian-based regularization functional, making the overall objective functional clearer and better defined. With a complete flexibility to choose the iterative optimization procedure for minimizing the above functional, RED is capable of incorporating any image denoising algorithm, can treat general inverse problems very effectively, and is guaranteed to converge to the globally optimal result. We test this…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/16m1102884

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The regularization term in the split optimization corresponds only to a denoising subproblem.

    “particularly, the regularization term only corresponds to a denoising subproblem [18,31,61].”

    From Learning Deep CNN Denoiser Prior for Image Restoration (2017) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romano, Y., Elad, M., & Milanfar, P.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
Published
2017-01
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
1804-1844
ISSN
1936-4954 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2573726823
Cited by
934
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
23.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (320640)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
regularization by denoising, image denoising, inverse problems, plug-and-play priors, Laplacian regularization, image deblurring, image super-resolution, alternating direction method of multipliers, iterative optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review