Cited by 7Complexity and Algorithms in GraphsLimits and Structures in Graph TheoryAdvanced Graph Theory Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lower Bounds for Maximum Weighted Cut

Open access
Gutin, Gregory, Yeo, Anders·2023·SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics

Abstract

Abstract. While there have been many results on lower bounds for Max Cut in unweighted graphs, the only lower bound for noninteger weights is that by Poljak and Turzík [ Discrete Math., 58 (1986), pp. 99–104]. In this paper, we launch an extensive study of lower bounds for Max Cut in weighted graphs. We introduce a new approach for obtaining lower bounds for Weighted Max Cut. Using it, the probabilistic method, Vizing’s chromatic index theorem, and other tools, we obtain several lower bounds for arbitrary weighted graphs, weighted graphs of bounded girth, and triangle-free weighted graphs. We pose conjectures and open questions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/21m1411913

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bollobás B., 2002, Contemporary Combinatorics, 185
  2. P. Erdös , On some problems in graph theory, combinatorial analysis and combinatorial number theory, in Graph Theory and Combinatorics (Cambridge, 1983), Academic Press, London, 1984, pp. 1–17.
  3. Karp R. M., 2013, Complexity of Computer Computations (Yorktown Heights, NY, 1972), 85

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Gutin, G., & Yeo, A.
Affiliations
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
Published
2023-06-16
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
1142-1161
ISSN
  • 0895-4801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7146
OpenAlex
W4380886424
Cited by
7
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Graph Theory Research
Keywords
lower bounds, MaxCut, weighted graphs, triangle-free graphs, probabilistic methods, hardness of approximation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review