Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 326

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minimizers of Cost-Functions Involving Nonsmooth Data-Fidelity Terms. Application to the Processing of Outliers

Nikolova, Mila·2002·SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis

Abstract

We present a theoretical study of the recovery of an unknown vector $x\in{\mathbb R}^p$ (such as a signal or an image) from noisy data $y\in{\mathbb R}^q$ by minimizing with respect to x a regularized cost-function ${\cal F}(x,y)=\Psi(x,y)+\alpha\Phi(x)$, where $\Psi$ is a data-fidelity term, $\Phi$ is a smooth regularization term, and $\alpha > 0$ is a parameter. Typically, $\Psi(x,y)=\|Ax-y \|^2$, where A is a linear operator. The data-fidelity terms $\Psi$ involved in regularized cost-functions are generally smooth functions; only a few papers make an exception to this and they consider restricted situations. Nonsmooth data-fidelity terms are avoided in image processing. In spite of this, we consider both smooth and nonsmooth data-fidelity terms. Our goal is to capture essential features exhibited by the local minimizers of regularized cost-functions in relation to the smoothness of the data-fidelity term. In order to fix the context of our study, we consider $\Psi(x,y)=\sum_i\psi(a_i^Tx-y_i)$, where $a_i^T$ are the rows of A and $\psi$ is ${\cal C}^m$ on ${\mathbb R}\setminus \{0\}$. We show that if $\psi\1(0^-) < \psi\1(0^+)$, then typical data y give rise to local minimizers $\hat x$ of ${\cal F}(.,y)$ which fit exactly a certain number of the data entries: there is a possibly large set $\hat h$ of indexes such that $a_i^T\hat x=y_i$ for every $i\in\hat h$. In contrast, if $\psi$ is smooth on ${\mathbb R}$, for almost every y, the local minimizers of ${\cal F}(.,y)$ do not fit any entry of y. Thus, the possibility that a local minimizer fits some data entries is due to the nonsmoothness of the data-fidelity term. This is a strong mathematical property which is useful in practice. By way of application, we construct a cost-function allowing aberrant data (outliers) to be detected and to be selectively smoothed. Our numerical experiments advocate the use of nonsmooth data-fidelity terms in regularized cost-functions for special purposes in image and signal processing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/s0036142901389165

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 326

Metadata

Authors
Nikolova, M.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis
Published
2002-01
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
965-994
ISSN
  • 0036-1429 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-7170
OpenAlex
W2111841405
Cited by
326
References
32
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimizers of Cost-Functions Involving Nonsmooth Data-Fidelity Terms. Application to the Processing of Outliers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/s0036142901389165
The paper
Nikolova, M. (2002). Minimizers of Cost-Functions Involving Nonsmooth Data-Fidelity Terms. Application to the Processing of Outliers. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0036142901389165

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.