The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying the Minimal Transversals of a Hypergraph and Related Problems
Abstract
The paper considers two decision problems on hypergraphs, hypergraph saturation and recognition of the transversal hypergraph, and discusses their significance for several search problems in applied computer science. Hypergraph saturation (i.e., given a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$, decide if every subset of vertices is contained in or contains some edge of $\mathcal{H}$) is shown to be co-${\bf NP}$-complete. A certain subproblem of hypergraph saturation, the saturation of simple hypergraphs (i.e., Sperner families), is shown to be under polynomial transformation equivalent to transversal hypergraph recognition; i.e., given two hypergraphs $\mathcal{H}_{1}$, $\mathcal{H}_{2}$, decide if the sets in $\mathcal{H}_{2}$ are all the minimal transversals of $\mathcal{H}_{1}$. The complexity of the search problem related to the recognition of the transversal hypergraph, the computation of the transversal hypergraph, is an open problem. This task needs time exponential in the input size; it is unknown whether an output-polynomial algorithm exists. For several important subcases (for instance, if an upper or lower bound is imposed on the edge size or for acyclic hypergraphs) output-polynomial algorithms are presented. Computing or recognizing the minimal transversals of a hypergraph is a frequent problem in practice, which is pointed out by identifying important applications in database theory, Boolean switching theory, logic, and artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in model-based diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1979) · Cited by 43,841
A theory of diagnosis from first principles
Reiter, R. (1987) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(87)90062-2 · Cited by 3,031
The complexity of computing the permanent
Valiant, L. G. (1979) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/0304-3975(79)90044-6 · Cited by 2,705
Principles of database and knowledge-base systems
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-5107 · Cited by 2,683
Some simplified NP-complete graph problems
Garey, M. R., Johnson, D. S., & Stockmeyer, L. (1976) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/0304-3975(76)90059-1 · Cited by 2,059
de Kleer, J., & Williams, B. C. (1987) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(87)90063-4 · Cited by 2,039
Iverson, K. E. (1962) · Proceedings of the May 1-3, 1962, spring joint computer conference on - AIEE-IRE '62 (Spring) · doi:10.1145/1460833.1460872 · Cited by 1,067
Tarjan, R. E., & Yannakakis, M. (1984) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0213035 · Cited by 1,058
On the Desirability of Acyclic Database Schemes
Beeri, C., Fagin, R., Maier, D., & Yannakakis, M. (1983) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2402.322389 · Cited by 808
The NP-completeness column: An ongoing guide
Johnson, D. S. (1986) · Journal of Algorithms · doi:10.1016/0196-6774(86)90020-9 · Cited by 794
Metadata
- Authors
- Eiter, T., & Gottlob, G.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Computing
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1278-1304
- ISSN
- 0097-5397 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7111
- OpenAlex
- W1972004026
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 11.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying the Minimal Transversals of a Hypergraph and Related Problems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/s0097539793250299
- The paper
- Eiter, T., & Gottlob, G. (1995). Identifying the Minimal Transversals of a Hypergraph and Related Problems. SIAM Journal on Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/s0097539793250299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.