The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning Irregular Graphs
Abstract
Recently, a number of researchers have investigated a class of graph partitioning algorithms that reduce the size of the graph by collapsing vertices and edges, partition the smaller graph, and then uncoarsen it to construct a partition for the original graph [Bui and Jones, Proc. of the 6th SIAM Conference on Parallel Processing for Scientific Computing, 1993, 445--452; Hendrickson and Leland, A Multilevel Algorithm for Partitioning Graphs, Tech. report SAND 93-1301, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1993]. From the early work it was clear that multilevel techniques held great promise; however, it was not knownif they can be made to consistently produce high quality partitions for graphs arising in a wide range of application domains. We investigate the effectiveness of many different choices for all three phases: coarsening, partition of the coarsest graph, and refinement. In particular, we present a new coarsening heuristic (called heavy-edge heuristic) for which the size of the partition of the coarse graph is within a small factor of the size of the final partition obtained after multilevel refinement. We also present a much faster variation of the Kernighan--Lin (KL) algorithm for refining during uncoarsening. We test our scheme on a large number of graphs arising in various domains including finite element methods, linear programming, VLSI, and transportation. Our experiments show that our scheme produces partitions that are consistently better than those produced by spectral partitioning schemes in substantially smaller time. Also, when our scheme is used to compute fill-reducing orderings for sparse matrices, it produces orderings that have substantially smaller fill than the widely used multiple minimum degree algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bundle Adjustment — A Modern Synthesis
Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P. F., Hartley, R. I., & Fitzgibbon, A. W. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7_21 · Cited by 3,988
Lindgren, F., Rue, H., & Lindström, J. (2011) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00777.x · Cited by 2,708
Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations with PARDISO
Schenk, O., & Gärtner, K. (2004) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2003.07.011 · Cited by 1,467
Cluster-GCN: An Efficient Algorithm for Training Deep and Large Graph Convolutional Networks
Chiang, W.-L., Liu, X., Si, S., Li, Y., Bengio, S., & Hsieh, C.-J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330925 · Cited by 1,331
octopus:a tool for the application of time‐dependent density functional theory
Castro, A., Appel, H., Oliveira, M., Rozzi, C. A., Andrade, X., Lorenzen, F., Marques, M. A. L., Gross, E. K. U., & Rubio, A. (2006) · physica status solidi (b) · doi:10.1002/pssb.200642067 · Cited by 894
Metadata
- Authors
- Karypis, G., & Kumar, V.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 359-392
- ISSN
- 1064-8275 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2070232376
- Cited by
- 5,762
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 105.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning Irregular Graphs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/s1064827595287997
- The paper
- Karypis, G., & Kumar, V. (1998). A Fast and High Quality Multilevel Scheme for Partitioning Irregular Graphs. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. https://doi.org/10.1137/s1064827595287997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.