The DOI matches its Crossref record; 249 of the 249 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gap dynamics of forest trees: A review with particular attention to boreal forests
Abstract
Small-scale gap disturbance in forests is reviewed. Caused by the death of individual or multiple trees with subsequent fall from the canopy, gaps have been extensively studied in temperate deciduous and tropical forests for the past 20 years. This review considers much of this research with a view to assessing the importance of gap disturbance in boreal forests. Because of the ubiquity of large-scale, stand-initiating disturbances such as landscape-level fires, epidemic insect outbreaks, and periodic extensive windthrow events, gap processes in boreal forests have received little attention. Research in the Scandinavian and Russian boreal forest, as well as in high-altitude boreal "outliers" found in Japan and the United States, is showing that gap disturbance determines forest structure and processes to a greater extent than previously assumed. Boreal forests dominated by the shade-tolerant fir (Abies) spruce (Picea) complex are particularly well-adapted to the development of long-term, old-growth continuity in the absence of large-scale disturbance. Key words: gap dynamics, disturbance, boreal forests, temperate forests, tropical forests, silviculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cressie, N. (1992) · Terra Nova · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00605.x · Cited by 8,823
THE MAINTENANCE OF SPECIES‐RICHNESS IN PLANT COMMUNITIES: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE REGENERATION NICHE
GRUBB, P. J. (1977) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1977.tb01347.x · Cited by 4,402
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics.
Proctor, J., Pickett, S. T. A., & White, P. S. (1986) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403105 · Cited by 3,949
Ecology of Coarse Woody Debris in Temperate Ecosystems
Harmon, M. E., Franklin, J. F., Swanson, F. J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S. V., Lattin, J. D., Anderson, N. H., Cline, S. P., Aumen, N. G., Sedell, J. R., et al. (1986) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60121-x · Cited by 3,749
Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns
(1986) · Environmental Software · doi:10.1016/0266-9838(86)90012-2 · Cited by 2,934
The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms
Tansley, A. G. (1935) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1930070 · Cited by 2,908
Ripley, B. D. (1981) · Cited by 2,819
Spatial pattern and ecological analysis
Legendre, P., & Fortin, M. J. (1989) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00048036 · Cited by 2,335
The Role of Disturbance in Natural Communities
Sousa, W. P. (1984) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002033 · Cited by 2,305
Pattern and Process in the Plant Community
Watt, A. S. (1947) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2256497 · Cited by 2,285
Cited by
Anticipating the consequences of climate change for Canada’s boreal forest ecosystems
Price, D. T., Alfaro, R. I., Brown, K. J., Flannigan, M. D., Fleming, R. A., Hogg, E. H., Girardin, M. P., Lakusta, T., Johnston, M., McKenney, D. W., et al. (2013) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/er-2013-0042 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- McCarthy, J.
- Venue
- Environmental Reviews
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-59
- ISSN
- 1181-8700 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6053
- OpenAlex
- W1967712348
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 249
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gap dynamics of forest trees: A review with particular attention to boreal forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/a00-012
- The paper
- McCarthy, J. (2001). Gap dynamics of forest trees: A review with particular attention to boreal forests. Environmental Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1139/a00-012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.