Cited by 83Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Effects of acute exercise on appetite hormones and ad libitum energy intake in men and women

Hagobian, Todd Alan, Yamashiro, Megan, Hinkel-Lipsker, Jake, Streder, Katherine, Evero, Nero, Hackney, Terry·2013·Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

Abstract

Acute exercise suppresses relative energy intake; however, it remains unclear whether this occurs in both men and women exposed to the same relative exercise treatment. Eleven healthy men (22 ± 2 years; 16% ± 6% body fat (BF); 26 ± 4 body mass index (BMI); 42.9 ± 6.5 mL·kg–1·min–1 peak oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]O 2peak)) and 10 healthy women (21 ± 2 years; 24 ± 2 BMI; 23% ± 3% BF; 39.9 ± 5.5 mL·kg–1·min–1 [Formula: see text]O 2peak) rested for 60 min or exercised on a cycle ergometer at 70% [Formula: see text]O 2peak until 30% of total daily energy expenditure was expended (men, expenditure = 975 ± 195 kcal in 82 ± 13 min; women, expenditure = 713 ± 86 kcal in 84 ± 17 min) in a counterbalanced, crossover fashion. Appetite hormones and appetite ratings were assessed in response to each condition. Forty minutes after both conditions, ad libitum total and relative energy intake (energy intake minus energy cost of exercise) were assessed at a buffet meal. There was no significant sex or condition effect in appetite hormones (PYY 3-36, acylated ghrelin, insulin) and appetite ratings (hunger, satisfaction, fullness). Total energy intake in men was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in exercise and rest conditions (1648 ± 950, 1216 ± 633 kcal, respectively) compared with women (591 ± 183, 590 ± 231 kcal, respectively). Relative energy intake was significantly lower (P < 0.05) after exercise compared with rest in men (672 ± 827, 1133 ± 619 kcal, respectively) and women (−121 ± 243, 530 ± 233 kcal, respectively). These data highlight the effectiveness of acute exercise to suppress relative energy intake regardless of sex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/apnm-2012-0104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 83

Authors
Hagobian, T. A., Yamashiro, M., Hinkel-Lipsker, J., Streder, K., Evero, N., & Hackney, T.
Affiliations
California Polytechnic State University (US)
Venue
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Published
2013-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
66-72
ISSN
  • 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-5320
OpenAlex
W1840653188
Cited by
83
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
acute exercise, appetite-regulating hormones, ad libitum energy intake, sex differences, ghrelin, PYY3-36, insulin, hunger, satiety, energy expenditure, buffet meals
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Appetite, Bicycling, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Reference Values, Rest, Sex Factors, Biomarkers, Exercise, Cross-Over Studies, Peptide YY, Ghrelin, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review