The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance
Abstract
It is well known from laboratory studies that a single mycorrhizal fungal isolate can colonize different plant species, form interplant linkages, and provide a conduit for interplant transfer of isotopic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, or water. There is increasing laboratory and field evidence that the magnitude and direction of transfer is influenced by physiological sourcesink gradients between plants. There is also evidence that mycorrhizal fungi play a role in regulating transfer through their own sourcesink patterns, frequency of links, and mycorrhizal dependency. Although it is plausible that connections are extensive in nature, field studies have been hampered by our inability to observe them in situ and by belowground complexity. In future, isotopic tracers, morphological observations, microsatellite techniques, and fluorescent dyes will be useful in the study of networks in nature. Mycorrhizal networks have the potential to influence patterns of seedling establishment, interplant competition, plant diversity, and plant community dynamics, but studies in this area are just beginning. Future plant community studies would benefit from concurrent experimental use of fungal network controls, isotopic labeling, direct observation of interplant linkages, and long-term observation in the field. In this paper, we review recent literature on mycorrhizal networks and interplant carbon transfer, suggest future research directions, and highlight promising scientific approaches.Key words: common mycorrhizal network, carbon transfer, sourcesink, establishment, competition, diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Species diversity in ecological communities
Wiens, J. A. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90163-5 · Cited by 1,720
Positive interactions among plants
Callaway, R. M. (1995) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02912621 · Cited by 1,687
Bever, J. D., Westover, K. M., & Antonovics, J. (1997) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2960528 · Cited by 1,201
Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field
Simard, S. W., Perry, D. A., Jones, M. D., Myrold, D. D., Durall, D. M., & Molina, R. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/41557 · Cited by 1,053
Self-citationBoreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen
Näsholm, T., Ekblad, A., Nordin, A., Giesler, R., Högberg, M., & Högberg, P. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31921 · Cited by 1,030
Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest
Harms, K. E., Wright, S. J., Calderón, O., Hernández, A., & Herre, E. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35006630 · Cited by 1,021
Dark septate endophytes: a review of facultative biotrophic root‐colonizing fungi
JUMPPONEN, A., & TRAPPE, J. M. (1998) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00265.x · Cited by 1,002
Bever, J. D. (2003) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00714.x · Cited by 873
Floristic diversity in a model system using experimental microcosms
Grime, J. P., Mackey, J. M. L., Hillier, S. H., & Read, D. J. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/328420a0 · Cited by 796
Cited by
A meta‐analysis of context‐dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi
Hoeksema, J. D., Chaudhary, V. B., Gehring, C. A., Johnson, N. C., Karst, J., Koide, R. T., Pringle, A., Zabinski, C., Bever, J. D., Moore, J. C., et al. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x · Cited by 1,199
Mycorrhizal networks: Mechanisms, ecology and modelling
Simard, S. W., Beiler, K. J., Bingham, M. A., Deslippe, J. R., Philip, L. J., & Teste, F. P. (2012) · Fungal Biology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.fbr.2012.01.001 · Cited by 593
Self-citationInterplant Communication of Tomato Plants through Underground Common Mycorrhizal Networks
Song, Y. Y., Zeng, R. S., Xu, J. F., Li, J., Shen, X., & Yihdego, W. G. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013324 · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- Simard, S. W., & Durall, D. M.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1140-1165
- ISSN
- 0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982347122
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 18.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/b04-116
- The paper
- Simard, S. W., & Durall, D. M. (2004). Mycorrhizal networks: a review of their extent, function, and importance. Canadian Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-116
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.