Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 479

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

REVISIONES HYPHOMYCETUM ALIQUOT CUM APPENDICE DE NOMINIBUS REJICIENDIS

Hughes, S. J.·1958·Canadian Journal of Botany

Abstract

Nearly 400 generic names and 1000 species names of microfungi, mostly Hyphomycetes, have been checked from the original publications. Access to type or authenticated material of most of them has resulted in some revisions. Seven generic names and 22 species names are shown to be nomina dubia or nomina confusa.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/b58-067

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 479

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, S. J.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Botany
Published
1958-11-01
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
727-836
ISSN
0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101895050
Cited by
479
References
0
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: REVISIONES HYPHOMYCETUM ALIQUOT CUM APPENDICE DE NOMINIBUS REJICIENDIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/b58-067
The paper
Hughes, S. J. (1958). REVISIONES HYPHOMYCETUM ALIQUOT CUM APPENDICE DE NOMINIBUS REJICIENDIS. Canadian Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1139/b58-067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.