Cited by 53Marine and coastal plant biologyGenetic diversity and population structureBotany and Plant Ecology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Genotypic and phenotypic variability of Zostera marina on the west coast of North America

Backman, Thomas W. H.·1991·Canadian Journal of Botany

Abstract

The relation between environmental factors and leaf morphology of Zostera marina L. have long been unclear, primarily because the species is intrinsically variable. The common-garden method was used to determine the genetic, environmental, and interaction components of leaf size variation. Zostera marina consists of several ecotypes with a wide range of phenotypic plasticity. Variation in the morphology of Z. marina was of three types: genetic, accounting for 14% across the localities studied; environmental (phenotypic plasticity along temporal and spatial gradients), accounting for 32%; and interaction between genotype and environmental, acounting for 35%. Five ecotypes were described for the North American Pacific coast: Z. marina L. var. izembekensis Backman, Z. marina L. var. typica Setchell, Z. marina L. var. phillipsii Backman, Z. marina L. var. latifolia Morong, Z. marina L. var. atàm Backman. Temporal variation was due to seasonal phenotypic changes in ecotypes. Zostera marina var. izembekensis showed little seasonal morphological changes; Z. marina var. typica demonstrated minor increase in leaf size in spring and summer. Zostera marina var. phillipsii and Z. marina var. latifolia behaved similarly in that leaf size of both increased markedly in spring through early summer. Zostera marina var. phillipsii is adapted to Hood Canal and Puget Sound while Z. marina var. latifolia occupies the outer coast. Zostera marina var. atàm exhibits sexual reproduction exclusively a…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/b91-176

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Backman, T. W. H.
Corresponding author
Backman, Thomas W. H.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Botany
Published
1991-06-01
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
1361-1371
ISSN
0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169648287
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Botany (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Washington
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
Keywords
Zostera marina, seagrass, leaf size variation, phenotypic plasticity, genotypic variation, ecotypes, gene-environment interaction, common garden experiment, morphometrics, seasonal variation, North American Pacific coast, Gulf of California

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review