The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic-angle spinning investigation of the proximate-analysis fractions used to assess litter quality in decomposition studies
Abstract
Proximate analysis is often used in decomposition studies to characterize the organic components of foliar litter. The percent weight residue remaining after extraction by nonpolar and polar solvents and H 3 SO 4 hydrolysis (Klason lignin, KL) is commonly used as a measure of litter quality and a modelling parameter. While KL is associated with resistance to decay, its nature is not well understood and it has long been suspected that it incorporates nonlignin components. We used solid-state 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to characterize litter, extracted residue, and the KL fraction of five species. NMR shows that cutin and condensed tannin are both significant components of litter and its extraction residues, in addition to lignin and carbohydrate. Hydrolysis with H 2 SO 4 removes carbohydrates and amino acids, leaving the KL fraction derived from cutin, tannin, and lignin. Tannin retention in KL was also demonstrated by a hydrolysis study of purified tannins and a brown-rot lignin, using both NMR and the proanthocyanidin assay for condensed tannins. Although the NMR results are qualitative at this stage, it is clear that KL has limited use as a parameter controlling litter decomposition, and that other biopolymers should not be ignored in conceptual models, chemical analysis, and experimental design. Key words: Klason lignin, 13 C CPMAS NMR, proximate analysis, litter quality, decomposition, tannin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Forest Litter Decomposition in Relation to Soil Nitrogen Dynamics and Litter Quality
McClaugherty, C. A., Pastor, J., Aber, J. D., & Melillo, J. M. (1985) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941327 · Cited by 593
Cited by
Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate‐dependent
WALL, D. H., BRADFORD, M. A., ST. JOHN, M. G., TROFYMOW, J. A., BEHAN‐PELLETIER, V., BIGNELL, D. E., DANGERFIELD, J. M., PARTON, W. J., RUSEK, J., VOIGT, W., et al. (2008) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01672.x · Cited by 542
Self-citationLorenz, K., Lal, R., Preston, C. M., & Nierop, K. G. J. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.013 · Cited by 425
Self-citationCycling and composition of organic matter in terrestrial and marine ecosystems
Baldock, J. A., Masiello, C. A., Gélinas, Y., & Hedges, J. I. (2004) · Marine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2004.06.016 · Cited by 414
KNICKER, H., GONZALEZVILA, F., POLVILLO, O., GONZALEZ, J., & ALMENDROS, G. (2005) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.008 · Cited by 295
HETEROTROPHIC NITROGEN FIXATION IN DECOMPOSING LITTER: PATTERNS AND REGULATION
Vitousek, P. M., & Hobbie, S. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2366:hnfidl]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Preston, C. M., (Tony) Trofymow, J. A., Niu, J., & Sayer, B. G.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1997-09-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1601-1613
- ISSN
- 0008-4026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165148364
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic-angle spinning investigation of the proximate-analysis fractions used to assess litter quality in decomposition studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/b97-872
- The paper
- Preston, C. M., (Tony) Trofymow, J. A., Niu, J., & Sayer, B. G. (1997). 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with cross-polarization and magic-angle spinning investigation of the proximate-analysis fractions used to assess litter quality in decomposition studies. Canadian Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1139/b97-872
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.