Cited by 49Phagocytosis and Immune RegulationAutophagy in Disease and TherapyCellular transport and secretion

Phagocytosis: what’s on the menu?

Open access
Lancaster, Charlene E., Ho, Cheuk Y., Hipolito, Victoria E.B., Botelho, Roberto J., Terebiznik, Mauricio R.·2019·Biochemistry and Cell Biology

Abstract

Phagocytosis is an evolutionarily conserved process. In Protozoa, phagocytosis fulfills a feeding mechanism, while in Metazoa, phagocytosis diversified to play multiple organismal roles, including immune defence, tissue homeostasis, and remodeling. Accordingly, phagocytes display a high level of plasticity in their capacity to recognize, engulf, and process targets that differ in composition and morphology. Here, we review how phagocytosis adapts to its multiple roles and discuss in particular the effect of target morphology in phagocytic uptake and phagosome maturation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/bcb-2018-0008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phagocytosis is most likely the ancestral feeding mechanism of metazoans.

    “As phagocytosis is also the prevalent or only feeding mechanism in sponges, ctenophores, cnidarians and a subset of bilaterian animals (Fig. 1b; and below), it is most likely the ancestral feeding mechanism of metazoans”

    From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Lancaster et al. 2019

    In “Phagocytic Branches on the Tree of Life” (page unavailable), the review says phagocytosis originally had a nutritional role and describes sponges capturing food through phagocytosis. It does not specifically conclude that phagocytosis was the ancestral feeding mechanism of metazoans. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In vertebrates, tunicates or insects, phagocytosis is mainly restricted to immune cells and plays little or no role during intestinal digestion.

    “Notably, in a number of bilaterian groups including vertebrates, tunicates or insects, phagocytosis (and to a lesser extent pinocytosis) is mainly restricted to immune cells of the blood or nervous system and plays little or no role during intestinal digestion (Fig. 1b and references)(Lancaster et al. 2019; O'hagan 1996; Schafer and Stevens 2013; Yonge 1937).”

    From A non-bilaterian perspective on the development and evolution of animal digestive systems (2019) · cites this paper as Lancaster et al. 2019

    In “Phagocytic Branches on the Tree of Life” (page not provided), the paper describes immune-cell phagocytosis in insects and vertebrates, supporting that part of the claim. It also describes phagocytosis by non-immune cells, and the passages do not establish that phagocytosis is mainly restricted to immune cells in these groups or plays little or no role in their intestinal digestion. They do not address tunicates. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 145 · Cited by 49

Authors
Lancaster, C. E., Ho, C. Y., Hipolito, V. E. B., Botelho, R. J., & Terebiznik, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Botelho, Roberto J.
  • Terebiznik, Mauricio R.
Venue
Biochemistry and Cell Biology
Published
2019-02
Volume
97
Issue
1
Pages
21-29
ISSN
  • 0829-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6002
OpenAlex
W2803948950
Cited by
49
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochemistry and Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
Keywords
phagocytosis, phagosome maturation, immune defence, tissue homeostasis, tissue remodeling, protozoan feeding, engulfment, target recognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Physiological Phenomena, Humans, Phagocytosis, Phagosomes, Receptors, Cell Surface, Signal Transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review