The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intense rockburst impacts in deep underground construction and their prevention
Abstract
In the last few decades, in both mining and civil engineering projects, deeper excavations have been carried out than in the past. With this increase in depth, rocks may overstress and rock failures can occur during excavation. When competent rock strata are encountered under high stress conditions, these failures can vary from superficial spalling to explosive rockburst. Intense rockbursts may cause fatal injuries to workers and significant loss of equipment and time. The occurrence of rockbursts is always difficult to predict and special steps and measures must be taken to control them. First, burst-prone zones must be predicted by an early exhaustive geological study and by the assessment of in situ stress level and orientation. Second, basic design parameters, e.g., shape, size, and excavation method, should be modified and adapted to the expected conditions to minimize rockburst risk. Third, in situ pre-conditioning methods, e.g., destress blasting, can be applied to decrease the capacity of the rock mass to store energy. Finally, special rock support and reinforcement systems, i.e., yielding systems, must be installed after excavation to ensure total stability of the opening. This paper reviews the geological and geomechanical factors that provoke and influence rockbursts in overstressed rock masses and the engineering measures taken to control them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
Griffith, A. A. (1921) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 · Cited by 11,052
First‐ and second‐order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project
Zoback, M. L. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/92jb00132 · Cited by 1,891
Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock
Hoek, E., Kaiser, P. K., & Bawden, W. F. (2000) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16978 · Cited by 993
Cai, M., Kaiser, P. K., Tasaka, Y., Maejima, T., Morioka, H., & Minami, M. (2004) · International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.02.001 · Cited by 904
Prediction of tunnel deformation in squeezing grounds
Dwivedi, R. D., Singh, M., Viladkar, M. N., & Goel, R. K. (2013) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.04.005 · Cited by 100
Influence of the stress state in a coal bump-prone deep coalbed: A case study
Aguado, M. B. D., & González, C. (2008) · International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.07.005 · Cited by 53
34 State of stress in the Earth's lithosphere
Zoback, M. D., & Zoback, M. L. (2002) · International geophysics/International geophysics series · doi:10.1016/s0074-6142(02)80237-6 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazaira, A., & Konicek, P.
- Venue
- Canadian Geotechnical Journal
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1426-1439
- ISSN
- 0008-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6010
- OpenAlex
- W1968724959
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intense rockburst impacts in deep underground construction and their prevention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cgj-2014-0359
- The paper
- Mazaira, A., & Konicek, P. (2015). Intense rockburst impacts in deep underground construction and their prevention. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0359
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.