Cited by 86Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchGeotechnical and construction materials studies

Systematic approach to assessing the applicability of fly-ash-based geopolymer for clay stabilization

Abdullah, Hayder H., Shahin, Mohamed A., Walske, Megan L., Karrech, Ali·2020·Canadian Geotechnical Journal

Abstract

Traditional soil stabilization by chemical additives such as cement and lime is a well-established technique for ground improvement of problematic soils. However, with the advantage of lower carbon emission and energy consumption, fly-ash-based geopolymer has recently become an attractive alternative to traditional stabilizers. Nevertheless, the literature lacks systemic approaches that assist engineers to apply this promising binder for soil stabilization, including the proper dosages required for an effective treatment. This paper introduces a systematic approach to assess the applicability of fly-ash-based geopolymer for stabilization of clay soils, through a comprehensive experimental program where engineered and natural clays were examined and evaluated, including soil compaction, plasticity, compressive strength, durability, pH level, and impact of pulverization. The results revealed several factors that influence the level of enhancement of geopolymer-treated clays, including the soil mineralogy, plasticity–activity properties, geopolymer concentration, curing time, and pulverization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cgj-2019-0215

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In order to produce geopolymer, the sources of alumina and silica (fly ash and GGBFS) act as precursors that are easily dissolved in alkaline solutions resulted from alkaline activation, making geopolymerization possible.

    “In order to produce geopolymer, the sources of alumina and silica (fly ash and GGBFS) act as precursors that are easily dissolved in alkaline solutions resulted from alkaline activation, making geopolymerization possible [47,49,57,58,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdullah, H. H., Shahin, M. A., Walske, M. L., & Karrech, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology - Iraq (IQ)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Venue
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2020-09
Volume
57
Issue
9
Pages
1356-1368
ISSN
  • 0008-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6010
OpenAlex
W2984253369
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Geotechnical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
fly ash geopolymer, clay stabilization, soil stabilization, soil improvement, curing time, pulverization, soil compaction, plasticity, compressive strength, durability, soil mineralogy, plasticity index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review