Coal-derived char for durability improvement of cement stabilized soil under freeze–thaw, wet–dry, and sulfate attack
Abstract
Cement soil stabilization is widely used in civil engineering to improve the performance of soils subjected to freeze–thaw (F–T), wet–dry (W–D), and sulfate attack (SA). Due to the negative impacts associated with manufacturing cement, the development of eco-friendly and sustainable additives is highly desirable. Coal-derived char is a cost-effective byproduct of the coal pyrolysis process. In this study, the influence of coal char on mineralogical, microstructural, physical, and mechanical properties of cement stabilized soils (with cement contents of 0%–20% and char contents of 0%–30%) subjected to F–T cycles, W–D cycles, and SA is investigated. Compared to cement stabilized soils, char-cement stabilized soils exhibit up to 60.8% fewer volume changes during F–T cycles and 31.6% fewer during W–D cycles. The compressive strength of char-cement stabilized soils with cement contents of 5%, 10%, and 20% are on average 7.9%, 17.6%, and 11.0%, respectively, higher than that of cement stabilized soil subjected to F–T cycles, W–D cycles, or SA. The inclusion of char promotes cement hydration and results in the formation of more amorphous hydration products that fill voids or cover soil minerals. The findings indicate the promising potential of coal char in enhancing soil performance under a range of challenging environmental conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Incorporation of biochar in cementitious materials: A roadmap of biochar selection
Maljaee, H., Madadi, R., Paiva, H., Tarelho, L., & Ferreira, V. M. (2021) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122757 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Reusing biochar as a filler or cement replacement material in cementitious composites: A review
Danish, A., Ali Mosaberpanah, M., Usama Salim, M., Ahmad, N., Ahmad, F., & Ahmad, A. (2021) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124295 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Yu, H., Joshi, P., Lau, C., & Ng, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Venue
- Canadian Geotechnical Journal
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 1-20
- ISSN
- 0008-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6010
- OpenAlex
- W4396601217
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Geotechnical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- soil-cement, soil stabilization, freeze-thaw cycles, wetting-drying cycles, sulfate attack, durability, compressive strength, volume change, cement hydration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review