Cited by 22Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical and construction materials studiesConcrete and Cement Materials Research

Coal-derived char for durability improvement of cement stabilized soil under freeze–thaw, wet–dry, and sulfate attack

Yu, Hua, Joshi, Priyanka, Lau, Chooikim, Ng, Kam·2025·Canadian Geotechnical Journal

Abstract

Cement soil stabilization is widely used in civil engineering to improve the performance of soils subjected to freeze–thaw (F–T), wet–dry (W–D), and sulfate attack (SA). Due to the negative impacts associated with manufacturing cement, the development of eco-friendly and sustainable additives is highly desirable. Coal-derived char is a cost-effective byproduct of the coal pyrolysis process. In this study, the influence of coal char on mineralogical, microstructural, physical, and mechanical properties of cement stabilized soils (with cement contents of 0%–20% and char contents of 0%–30%) subjected to F–T cycles, W–D cycles, and SA is investigated. Compared to cement stabilized soils, char-cement stabilized soils exhibit up to 60.8% fewer volume changes during F–T cycles and 31.6% fewer during W–D cycles. The compressive strength of char-cement stabilized soils with cement contents of 5%, 10%, and 20% are on average 7.9%, 17.6%, and 11.0%, respectively, higher than that of cement stabilized soil subjected to F–T cycles, W–D cycles, or SA. The inclusion of char promotes cement hydration and results in the formation of more amorphous hydration products that fill voids or cover soil minerals. The findings indicate the promising potential of coal char in enhancing soil performance under a range of challenging environmental conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cgj-2023-0626

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yu, H., Joshi, P., Lau, C., & Ng, K.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Venue
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
Volume
62
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 0008-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6010
OpenAlex
W4396601217
Cited by
22
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Geotechnical Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
soil-cement, soil stabilization, freeze-thaw cycles, wetting-drying cycles, sulfate attack, durability, compressive strength, volume change, cement hydration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review