Cited by 54Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Disentangling bottom-up and top-down effects on survival during early ocean residence in a population of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)

Miller, Jessica A., Teel, David J., Baptista, Antonio, Morgan, Cheryl A.·2013·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

We evaluated the relative importance of “bottom-up” (production-limited) and “top-down” (predator-mediated) processes during early marine residence in a population of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the upper Columbia River, USA. We examined length, mass, and condition index of age-0 juveniles collected in the ocean during June and September across 11 years in relation to conditions in the river, estuary, and coastal ocean and to future adult returns. Characteristics of juveniles in September, but not June, were related to adult returns. During years when coastal waters were relatively cool and productive, juveniles captured in September displayed relatively low condition and reduced otolith growth compared with years when coastal waters were relatively warm and unproductive; this contrast indicates that top-down effects such as selective mortality or competition are important during early marine residence. Key physical (river plume volume during emigration) and biological (condition) variables and their interaction accounted for >95% of the variation in adult returns. Future research should focus on evaluating predators and competitors and understanding how river plume structure influences survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cjfas-2012-0354

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, J. A., Teel, D. J., Baptista, A., & Morgan, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center for Coastal Margin Observation & Prediction, Oregon Health & Science University, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2013-04
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
617-629
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W2119482703
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Bonneville Power Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, bottom-up effects, top-down effects, juvenile salmonids, otolith growth, selective mortality, predator competition, river plume, estuaries, adult returns, Upper Columbia River, ocean productivity, sea surface temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review