The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Depensation in fish stocks: a hierarchic Bayesian meta-analysis
Abstract
The probability of different levels of depensation within four taxonomic groups was calculated using a Bayesian technique called hierarchical modeling. With this method we combined spawner-recruit data from many stocks within a taxon to estimate the distribution describing the variability of depensation within that taxon. The spawner-recruit model we use allows for both depensation (lower than expected recruits at low population levels) and hypercompensation (where recruits are higher than expected at low population levels). The end product of our analysis is a probability distribution that can be used as a Bayesian prior when analyzing a new data set. We examined four taxonomic groups (the salmonids, gadiforms, clupeiforms and pleuronectiforms) and found that, for all of the taxa, the most likely values fell close to or within the range of no depensation. However, because the distributions were very broad we suggest that analysis of stock recruitment data should incorporate spawner-recruit curves that include the possibility of depensation and hypercompensation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Teaching about Approximate Confidence Regions Based on Maximum Likelihood Estimation
Meeker, W. Q., & Escobar, L. A. (1995) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1995.10476112 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Ecopath with Ecosim: Methods, capabilities and limitations
Christensen, V., & Walters, C. J. (2004) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.003 · Cited by 1,914
Stephens, P. A., Sutherland, W. J., & Freckleton, R. P. (1999) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3547011 · Cited by 1,379
Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis
Nakagawa, S., & Santos, E. S. A. (2012) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-012-9555-5 · Cited by 1,032
Collapse and recovery of marine fishes
Hutchings, J. A. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35022565 · Cited by 912
Rose, K. A., Cowan, J. H., Winemiller, K. O., Myers, R. A., & Hilborn, R. (2001) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1046/j.1467-2960.2001.00056.x · Cited by 696
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liermann, M. C., & Hilborn, R. W.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1976-1984
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994727944
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depensation in fish stocks: a hierarchic Bayesian meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cjfas-54-9-1976
- The paper
- Liermann, M. C., & Hilborn, R. W. (1997). Depensation in fish stocks: a hierarchic Bayesian meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-54-9-1976
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.