The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Is spawner biomass a sensitive measure of the reproductive and recruitment potential of Northeast Arctic cod?
Abstract
The assumption that spawner biomass is directly proportional to total egg production by fish stocks underlies most spawner-recruit relationships. Despite its importance, this assumption is largely untested. Data describing the reproductive potential of Northeast Arctic (NEA) Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) were used to test the proportionality assumption for a period showing strong variation in condition and abundance of spawners. At the individual scale, relative fecundity varied with length and condition. This decreases the likelihood that the proportionality assumption is valid. At the stock level, total egg production was estimated (1985-1996) using acoustic estimates of total abundance and demographic information from trawl sampling in combination with year-specific fecundity-length relationships. For NEA cod, spawner biomass estimated by virtual population analysis (VPA) was not proportional to total egg production. Compared with VPA-based estimates of spawner biomass, total egg production is an improved index of recruitment potential because (i) the magnitude of variation observed in total egg production was closer to that observed in recruitment and (ii) the relationship between recruitment at age 1 and total egg production approaches the origin. The results suggest that further progress in explaining recruitment variation will be achieved using more sensitive measures of the true reproductive potential of the stock.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kjesbu, O. S., Witthames, P. R., Solemdal, P., & Greer Walker, M. (1998) · Journal of Sea Research · doi:10.1016/s1385-1101(98)00029-x · Cited by 286
Self-citationMurua, H., Rodriguez-Marin, E., Neilson, J. D., Farley, J. H., & Juan-Jordá, M. J. (2017) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-017-9474-1 · Cited by 89
Morgan, M. J., Murua, H., Kraus, G., Lambert, Y., Marteinsdóttir, G., Marshall, C. T., O’Brien, L., & Tomkiewicz, J. (2009) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f09-009 · Cited by 54
Self-citationEnergy allocation strategy of skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis during their reproductive cycle
Grande, M., Murua, H., Zudaire, I., Arsenault‐Pernet, E. J., Pernet, F., & Bodin, N. (2016) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.13125 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, C. T., Kjesbu, O. S., Yaragina, N. A., Solemdal, P., & Ulltang, Ø.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1766-1783
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W1981799479
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is spawner biomass a sensitive measure of the reproductive and recruitment potential of Northeast Arctic cod? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cjfas-55-7-1766
- The paper
- Marshall, C. T., Kjesbu, O. S., Yaragina, N. A., Solemdal, P., & Ulltang, Ø. (1998). Is spawner biomass a sensitive measure of the reproductive and recruitment potential of Northeast Arctic cod? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-55-7-1766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.