The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimation and analysis of biological parameters in elasmobranch fishes: a comparative life history study
Abstract
Published life-history parameters for sharks, skates, and rays over a wide geographic range were used to develop predictive models to estimate parameters that are difficult to measure or have not been previously estimated in elasmobranch species. We determined empirical relationships between body size (total length) and length at maturity (Lm) and age at maturity (Tm). The data used in determining these empirical relationships, the von Bertalanffy parameters asymptotic length (L[Formula: see text]) and growth rate (k), and natural mortality (M) and maximum age (Tmax) were used to describe the life-history strategies of elasmobranch fishes. M/k and Beverton's growthmaturitylongevity plots were used to make comparisons between teleost fishes, reptiles, and elasmobranchs. We found that the M/k ratio in elasmobranchs is significantly different from those for other fish and reptile taxa. We linked elasmobranch species fecundity (f) and Tm to potential vulnerability to population decline under exploitation. We found that larger species of elasmobranchs have lower growth rates (k) and potential population increases (r'). Elasmobranchs can be categorized by species maximum length to determine susceptibility of decline under exploitation. Generally, species greater than 100 cm are characterized by life-history and population traits that place them at greater risk of population decline.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Winemiller, K. O., & Rose, K. A. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f92-242 · Cited by 1,568
Cited by
Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays
Dulvy, N. K., Fowler, S. L., Musick, J. A., Cavanagh, R. D., Kyne, P. M., Harrison, L. R., Carlson, J. K., Davidson, L. N., Fordham, S. V., Francis, M. P., et al. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00590 · Cited by 2,047
Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean
Ferretti, F., Worm, B., Britten, G. L., Heithaus, M. R., & Lotze, H. K. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01489.x · Cited by 979
Then, A. Y., Hoenig, J. M., Hall, N. G., Hewitt, D. A., & Jardim, H. E. E. (2015) · ICES Journal of Marine Science · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu136 · Cited by 526
Cheung, W. W. L., Pitcher, T. J., & Pauly, D. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.017 · Cited by 520
The importance of habitat and life history to extinction risk in sharks, skates, rays and chimaeras
García, V. B., Lucifora, L. O., & Myers, R. A. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1295 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Frisk, M. G., Miller, T. J., & Fogarty, M. J.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 969-981
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2145297870
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation and analysis of biological parameters in elasmobranch fishes: a comparative life history study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cjfas-58-5-969
- The paper
- Frisk, M. G., Miller, T. J., & Fogarty, M. J. (2001). Estimation and analysis of biological parameters in elasmobranch fishes: a comparative life history study. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-58-5-969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.