The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis
Abstract
For more than a century, scientists have considered whether mixtures of tree species may differ in nutrition and yield relative to monocultures. We review the empirical evidence on the nutritional interactions of tree species in mixtures, including information on foliar nutrition, soil nutrient supply, rates of nutrient input, and patterns of root distribution. Linear effects were most common, with mixtures intermediate in value between monocultures. In some cases, values for mixtures were lower than expected, indicating an antagonistic interaction. A few cases that included nitrogen- fixing species showed a synergistic interaction, with mixtures showing higher values than monocultures. Nutrient concentrations in foliage of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carrière) were improved in mixtures with other conifers in three studies, in contrast to four studies with mixtures of various conifers and hardwoods that showed no effect of mixtures on foliage nutrient concentrations. Mixtures that combine species with and without the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen have shown a full range of foliar responses from decreases to increases in phosphorus, to increases in nitrogen, to no effect of mixtures. Rates of litter decomposition usually showed no effect of species mixtures, but a few cases demonstrated both increases and decreases in decomposition relative to monocultures. Pools of soil nutrients generally did not differ between mixtures and monocultures. Root distributions in mixtures of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) were altered in mixtures; compared with monocultures, spruce rooted more shallowly in mixtures with beech, and beech rooted more deeply in mixtures with spruce. General conclusions are limited by the small number of studies that directly addressed mixed-species effects in forests, and the wide variety of observed interactions. Further research would be particularly helpful in identifying situations where nonlinear interactions may develop, including the species and site conditions that promote nonlinear interactions. Neighborhood methods, which analyze the relationship between stand composition and nutritional properties on a small spatial scale, offer great potential for exploring nutritional effects in mixed-species stands.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Vandermeer, J. H. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623523 · Cited by 1,697
Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling
Hobbie, S. E. (1992) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90126-v · Cited by 1,242
Litter Production in Forests of the World
Bray, J. R., & Gorham, E. (1964) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60331-1 · Cited by 1,019
Ecology and management of forest soils
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-0292 · Cited by 876
EFFECTS OF PLANT COMPOSITION AND DIVERSITY ON NUTRIENT CYCLING
Hooper, D. U., & Vitousek, P. M. (1998) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0121:eopcad]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 815
Faunal Activities and Soil Processes: Adaptive Strategies That Determine Ecosystem Function
Lavelle, P. (1997) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60007-0 · Cited by 726
Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I., & Nicholson, K. S. (1997) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546010 · Cited by 723
Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species
Vogt, K. A., Vogt, D. J., Palmiotto, P. A., Boon, P., O'Hara, J., & Asbjornsen, H. (1995) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00017088 · Cited by 684
Why do Tree Species Affect Soils? The Warp and Woof of Tree-soil Interactions
Binkley, D., & Giardina, C. (1998) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1005948126251 · Cited by 603
Self-citation
Cited by
Decomposition dynamics in mixed‐species leaf litter
Gartner, T. B., & Cardon, Z. G. (2004) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12738.x · Cited by 1,049
A Review of Processes Behind Diversity—Productivity Relationships in Forests
Forrester, D. I., & Bauhus, J. (2016) · Current Forestry Reports · doi:10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2 · Cited by 641
The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry
Kelty, M. J. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.011 · Cited by 615
Forrester, D. I. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.003 · Cited by 599
Kirby, K. R., & Potvin, C. (2007) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.072 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Rothe, A., & Binkley, D.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1855-1870
- ISSN
- 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6037
- OpenAlex
- W2153232735
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/cjfr-31-11-1855
- The paper
- Rothe, A., & Binkley, D. (2001). Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-31-11-1855
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.