Cited by 101Vitamin D Research StudiesHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies

Vitamin D receptor, a tumor suppressor in skin

Open access
Bikle, Daniel D.·2015·Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

Abstract

Vitamin D and calcium are well-established regulators of keratinocyte proliferation and differentiation. Therefore, it was not a great surprise that deletion of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) should predispose the skin to tumor formation, and that the combination of deleting both the VDR and calcium sensing receptor (CaSR) should be especially pro-oncogenic. In this review I have examined 4 mechanisms that appear to underlie the means by which VDR acts as a tumor suppressor in skin. First, DNA damage repair is curtailed in the absence of the VDR, allowing mutations in DNA to accumulate. Second and third involve the increased activation of the hedgehog and β-catenin pathways in the epidermis in the absence of the VDR, leading to poorly regulated proliferation with reduced differentiation. Finally, VDR deletion leads to a shift in the expression of long noncoding RNAs toward a more oncogenic profile. How these different mechanisms interact and their relative importance in the predisposition of the VDR null epidermis to tumor formation remain under active investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/cjpp-2014-0367

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 119 · Cited by 101

Authors
Bikle, D. D.
Affiliations
San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Bikle, Daniel D.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
Published
2015-05
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
349-354
ISSN
  • 0008-4212 (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7541
OpenAlex
W2142228836
Cited by
101
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 BX001066, I01 BX003814)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR038386, R01AR050023)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41RR001614)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Keywords
vitamin D receptor, skin cancer, tumor suppression, keratinocyte proliferation, keratinocyte differentiation, calcium-sensing receptor, DNA repair, Hedgehog signaling, β-catenin signaling, long non-coding RNA, epidermis
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, DNA Damage, Humans, Skin, Skin Neoplasms, Vitamin D, Receptors, Calcitriol, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Receptors, Calcium-Sensing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review