Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Delaciation of the Prince Rupert – Kitimat area, British Columbia

Clague, John J.·1985·Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences

Abstract

Late Wisconsinan sediments in the Prince Rupert – Kitimat area of west-central British Columbia were deposited in an isostatically depressed marine environment affected by grounded tidewater glaciers. The most common sediments are (1) massive, bedded, and laminated muds, and (2) stratified sand and gravel. The former are accumulations of clay- and silt-size detritus transported in suspension from the mouths of meltwater streams and possibly in turbidity flows generated by submarine slope failures. The muds locally contain scattered ice-rafted stones, fossil marine molluscs, and foraminifera. The main sand and gravel deposits are elevated deltas, including both small incised fan-shaped forms at the margins of the main valleys and enormous ice-contact delta–sandur complexes on the floor of Kitsumkalum–Kitimat trough, the largest valley in the study area.Delaciation occurred by downwasting and complex frontal retreat between about 13 000 and 10 000 BP. The open outer coast became ice free first, in response to wholesale destabilization of the western periphery of the Cordilleran ice sheet by eustatically rising seas. Glaciers retreated rapidly by calving and soon were confined to fjords and mountain valleys; thereafter, they receded more slowly. The distribution of glaciomarine mud and raised deltaic deposits in Kitsumkalum–Kitimat trough indicates that retreat there was nonuniform, with intervals of catastrophic retreat separated by periods during which glacier snouts were relatively stable.Delaciation was accompanied and followed by rapid isostatic uplift. In Kitsumkalum–Kitimat trough, shorelines fell from about 200 m elevation at 10 500 BP to present sea level at about 8000 BP; about half of this fall occurred in perhaps as little as 500 years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/e85-022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The shallower ice surface could reflect change from an ice sheet unconstrained by local topography to a series of glaciers fed by the main ice sheet but topographically constrained within valleys and fjords.

    “The shallower ice surface could reflect change from an ice sheet unconstrained by local topography to a series of glaciers fed by the main ice sheet but topographically constrained within valleys and fjords (Clague, 1985).”
  • Retreat of the western ice margin may have been triggered by increased calving induced by eustatic sea-level rise and rapid deglacial isostatic adjustment.

    “The western ice margin was the only marine terminating section of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet, so retreat may have been triggered by increased calving induced by eustatic sea-level rise (Figure 4a) and rapid deglacial isostatic adjustment (Clague, 1985(Clague, , 1989;;Margold et al., 2013).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Clague, J. J.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
Published
1985-02-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
256-265
ISSN
  • 0008-4077
  • 1480-3313
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review