The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Onaping fault system: age constraints on deformation of the Kapuskasing structural zone and units underlying the Sudbury Structure
Abstract
The deformation of the Matachewan dyke swarm of the Superior Province, which includes a 60 km right-lateral offset and moderate uplift localized along the Kapuskasing structural zone, represents an important time marker in the evolution of the zone. However, the age of this deformation is poorly constrained. Here, it is shown that the prominent Mattagami River – Upper Wanapitei River fault of the Onaping fault system, which offsets 2167 Ma Biscotasing dykes south of the Kapuskasing structural zone, can be aligned with a fault of similar offset north of the zone after the Matachewan swarm is restored to its predeformational configuration. Thus, the deformation of the Matachewan swarm in the vicinity of the Kapuskasing structural zone must postdate the 2167 Ma emplacement and the subsequent faulting of the Biscotasing dykes. Southward extensions of faults of the Onaping fault system appear to offset aeromagnetic anomalies associated with highly magnetic units in the basement beneath the Sudbury Structure and Huronian sediments of the Southern Province, but do not substantially offset the Sudbury Structure itself. This suggests that the 1850 Ma Sudbury Structure was emplaced after most of the displacement on Onaping faults, while the unit underlying it, variously interpreted as the Archean Levack Gneiss Complex or a hidden ultramafic body of unknown age, predates Onaping faulting.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Onaping faults offset the 2.167 Ga NE-trending Biscotasing dikes by 7-8 km of sinistral wrench displacement.
“They are known to offset the 2.167 Ga, NEtrending Biscotasing dikes by 7-8 km of sinistral wrench displacement (Buchan and Ernst 1994).”
From Tectonic influences on the morphometry of the Sudbury impact structure: Implications for terrestrial cratering and modeling (2004) · cites this paper as Buchan and Ernst 1994
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spray, J. G., Butler, H. R., & Thompson, L. M. (2004) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00341.x · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchan, K. L., & Ernst, R. E.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1994-07-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1197-1205
- ISSN
- 0008-4077
- 1480-3313
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review