Estimation of recruitment in catch-at-age models
Abstract
Management strategies must be designed to take into account the uncertainty inherent in fish populations and their assessments. Annual recruitment variation is an important component of uncertainty. Several methods that allow the estimation of annual recruitment in statistical catch-at-age models are described: (a) maximum likelihood estimation with no penalty on the annual recruitment residuals, (b) maximum likelihood estimation with a lognormal penalty on the annual recruitment residuals, (c) importance sampling to numerically approximate the marginal likelihood with a lognormal penalty on the annual recruitment residuals, and (d) full Bayesian integration using Markov Chain Monte Carlo with a lognormal prior on the annual recruitment residuals. Simulation analysis is used to test the performance of these methods. All four methods perform similarly at estimating quantities that are based on averaging or summing multiple estimates of annual recruitment; however the marginal likelihood method (c) and Bayesian integration (d) perform best at estimating annual recruitment and the standard deviation in annual recruitment residuals (σR) when catch-at-age data is missing for some years. The ability to estimate σR can be important for defining uncertainty when developing management strategies. The methods are applied to a New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus) stock and the estimate of σR is approximately 0.6.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The marginal likelihood approach possesses superior statistical properties compared to the penalized likelihood approach.
“researchers have found that, compared to the penalized likelihood approach, the marginal likelihood approach possesses superior statistical properties (Maunder and Deriso, 2003; Valpine and Hilborn, 2005).”
From Impacts of phytoplankton availability on bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) recruitment in the Indian Ocean (2024) · cites this paper as Maunder and Deriso, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Geng, Z., & Zhu, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2024.1392273 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maunder, M. N., & Deriso, R. B.
- ORCID
- Maunder, Mark N
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2003-10-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1204-1216
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2089035173
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Keywords
- recruitment estimation, catch-at-age model, importance sampling, marginal likelihood, Bayesian integration, Markov chain Monte Carlo, maximum likelihood estimation, fish stock assessment, Pagrus auratus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review