Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux

Richardson, William B, Strauss, Eric A, Bartsch, Lynn A, Monroe, Emy M, Cavanaugh, Jennifer C, Vingum, Lorrine, Soballe, David M·2004·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

We evaluated patterns of denitrification and factors effecting denitrification in the upper Mississippi River. Measurements were taken over 2 years, during which river discharge ranged from record flooding to base flow conditions. Over the period of study, average denitrification enzyme activity was highest in backwater lakes and lowest in the main channel. Throughout the study reach, highest denitrification enzyme activity occurred during fall and lowest occurred in winter. Rates during spring floods (2001) were only slightly higher than during the preceding winter. Mean unamended denitrification rates ranged from 0.02 (fall 2001 in backwaters) to 0.40 µg N·cm–2·h–1(spring 2001 in backwaters). Laboratory experiments showed that denitrification rates increased significantly with addition of NO 3–regardless of sediment C content, while rates increased little with addition of labile C (glucose). Denitrification in this reach of the upper Mississippi River appears to be NO 3–limited throughout the growing season and the delivery of NO 3–is strongly controlled by river discharge and hydrologic connectivity across the floodplain. We estimate that denitrification removes 6939 t N·year–1 or 6.9% of the total annual NO 3–input to the reach. Hydrologic connectivity and resultant NO 3–delivery to high-C sediments is a critical determinant of reach-scale processing of N in this floodplain system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f04-062

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Richardson, W. B., Strauss, E. A., Bartsch, L. A., Monroe, E. M., Cavanaugh, J. C., Vingum, L., & Soballe, D. M.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2004-07-01
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
1102-1112
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W2115437960
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
9.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f04-062
The paper
Richardson, W. B., Strauss, E. A., Bartsch, L. A., Monroe, E. M., Cavanaugh, J. C., Vingum, L., & Soballe, D. M. (2004). Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.