The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux
Abstract
We evaluated patterns of denitrification and factors effecting denitrification in the upper Mississippi River. Measurements were taken over 2 years, during which river discharge ranged from record flooding to base flow conditions. Over the period of study, average denitrification enzyme activity was highest in backwater lakes and lowest in the main channel. Throughout the study reach, highest denitrification enzyme activity occurred during fall and lowest occurred in winter. Rates during spring floods (2001) were only slightly higher than during the preceding winter. Mean unamended denitrification rates ranged from 0.02 (fall 2001 in backwaters) to 0.40 µg N·cm2·h1(spring 2001 in backwaters). Laboratory experiments showed that denitrification rates increased significantly with addition of NO 3regardless of sediment C content, while rates increased little with addition of labile C (glucose). Denitrification in this reach of the upper Mississippi River appears to be NO 3limited throughout the growing season and the delivery of NO 3is strongly controlled by river discharge and hydrologic connectivity across the floodplain. We estimate that denitrification removes 6939 t N·year1 or 6.9% of the total annual NO 3input to the reach. Hydrologic connectivity and resultant NO 3delivery to high-C sediments is a critical determinant of reach-scale processing of N in this floodplain system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benthic organic carbon influences denitrification in streams with high nitrate concentration
ARANGO, C. P., TANK, J. L., SCHALLER, J. L., ROYER, T. V., BERNOT, M. J., & DAVID, M. B. (2007) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01758.x · Cited by 210
Factors Controlling Sediment Denitrification in Midwestern Streams of Varying Land Use
Inwood, S. E., Tank, J. L., & Bernot, M. J. (2007) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-006-9104-2 · Cited by 119
The Effects of Season and Agriculture on Nitrous Oxide Production in Headwater Streams
Beaulieu, J. J., Arango, C. P., & Tank, J. L. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0003 · Cited by 73
Powers, S. E. (2005) · doi:10.2172/15016223 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, W. B., Strauss, E. A., Bartsch, L. A., Monroe, E. M., Cavanaugh, J. C., Vingum, L., & Soballe, D. M.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2004-07-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1102-1112
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2115437960
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f04-062
- The paper
- Richardson, W. B., Strauss, E. A., Bartsch, L. A., Monroe, E. M., Cavanaugh, J. C., Vingum, L., & Soballe, D. M. (2004). Denitrification in the Upper Mississippi River: rates, controls, and contribution to nitrate flux. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f04-062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.