Cited by 23Marine and fisheries researchOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFish Ecology and Management Studies

Influence of oceanographic variability on recruitment of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the western and central Pacific Ocean

Langley, Adam, Briand, Karine, Kirby, David Seán, Murtugudde, Raghu·2009·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

Recruitment estimates for yellowfin tuna ( Thunnus albacares ) in the western and central Pacific Ocean (WCPO), derived from a stock assessment model, are highly variable seasonally, interannually, and over decadal periods. A generalized linear model (GLM) was developed that predicts the variation in yellowfin tuna recruitment in response to a range of oceanographic variables. The GLM model accounted for 54% of the variation in quarterly recruitment for the period 1980–2003, with the inclusion of seven different oceanographic variables derived from a zone within the northwestern equatorial region of the WCPO. The robustness of the recruitment model was investigated by cross-validation. The GLM was complemented by a cluster analysis approach that identified five principal oceanographic states within the northwestern zone selected by the GLM. Incorporation of the recent GLM recruitment indices in the yellowfin tuna stock assessment model is likely to improve the precision of estimates of current and projected (next 1–2 years) biomass and exploitation rates. In a broader context, the recruitment model provides a tool to investigate how yellowfin tuna recruitment might vary in response to short- and long-term variation in the oceanographic conditions of the WCPO.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f09-096

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains unclear how food availability affects the recruitment success of bigeye tuna.

    “Despite being routinely researched and assessed, it remains unclear how food availability affects the recruitment success of bigeye tuna.”
  • Only a limited amount of research has explored the influence of larval foraging success on bigeye tuna recruitment, with most information on tuna recruitment and reproduction confined to the Pacific Ocean.

    “Thus, only a limited amount of research has been conducted to explore the influence of larval foraging success on the recruitment of bigeye tuna, with most information being related to tuna recruitment and reproduction confined to the Pacific Ocean (Langley et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2010; Muhling et al., 2018; Woodworth-Jefcoats and Wren, 2020).”
  • Integrating recent GLM recruitment indices into stock assessment may enhance the precision of estimates of current and projected biomass and exploitation.

    “They reported that integrating the recent GLM recruitment indices into stock assessment may enhance the precision of estimates of the current and projected (in the next 1 to 2 years) biomass and exploitation.”
  • Langley et al. (2009) developed a generalized linear model to predict variation in yellowfin tuna recruitment across the western and central Pacific Ocean in relation to environmental variables.

    “Langley et al. (2009) developed a generalized linear model (GLM) to predict the variation in yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) recruitment across the western and central Pacific Ocean in relation to a multitude of environmental variables.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langley, A., Briand, K., Kirby, D. S., & Murtugudde, R.
Affiliations
Pacific Community (NC)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
2009-09
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
1462-1477
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W2149737828
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Pacific Community (SPC) Oceanic Fisheries Programme (The Pacific Community (SPC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Agency for International Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
yellowfin tuna, recruitment (biology), ocean variability, Western and Central Pacific Ocean, stock assessment models, generalized linear models, clustering, biomass estimation, exploitation rate, seasonal and interannual variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review