The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Amine-Citrate Buffers for p H Control in Starch Gel Electrophoresis
Abstract
Amine-citrate buffer systems for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis gave good resolution of some dehydrogenase isozymes. The pK's of three new amine buffers, N-(3-aminopropyl)-morpholine, pK 2 25 C, 6.12; N-(3-aminopropyl)-diethanolamine, pK 2 25 C, 6.90; and 1,3-bis(dimethylamino)-2-propanol, pK 2 25 C, 7.55, were determined at 5 C intervals in the range 10–40 C. These compounds, together with N, N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)iminotris(hydroxymethyl)methane (bis-Tris) and tris-(hydroxymethyl)-methylamine(Tris), provide a series of amine buffers with pK's at 0.5 unit intervals in the pH range 6.1–8.1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patterns of genetic polymorphism in five species of penguins
Karron, J. D. (1994) · The Auk · doi:10.2307/4088838 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Clayton, J. W., & Tretiak, D. N.
- Venue
- Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1972-08-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1169-1172
- ISSN
- 0015-296X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968184221
- Cited by
- 1,005
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amine-Citrate Buffers for p H Control in Starch Gel Electrophoresis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f72-172
- The paper
- Clayton, J. W., & Tretiak, D. N. (1972). Amine-Citrate Buffers for p H Control in Starch Gel Electrophoresis. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. https://doi.org/10.1139/f72-172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
