The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phosphorus Input and Its Consequences for Phytoplankton Standing Crop and Production in the Experimental Lakes Area and in Similar Lakes
Abstract
Correlation and regression analyses were used to assess several expressions for phosphorus loading, with and without corrections for water renewal and sedimentation, as predictors of total phosphorus concentration, chlorophyll, phytoplankton volume, and phytoplankton production in the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA) lakes. All expressions tested were good predictors, allowing predictions of the above parameters with 95% confidence intervals of 20–30% of the mean for any loading value. In general, correction for water renewal improved the fit of the expression, but correction for sedimentation did not. When the above strategy was applied to lakes outside ELA but with Shield or Shield-like drainage, good results were also obtained when expressions incorporating water renewal were used. If uncorrected for water renewal, loading was a poor predictor. Correction for sedimentation did not improve the expressions significantly. Correction for rapid changes in phosphorus input did not improve the predictability of equations, indicating that the equilibrium between ELA lakes and new loading conditions occurs very rapidly. Key words: Precambrian Shield lakes, eutrophication, lake management, nutrient inputs
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phytoplankton Community Ecology: The Role of Limiting Nutrients
Tilman, D., Kilham, S. S., & Kilham, P. (1982) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.002025 · Cited by 1,085
THE RELATIONSHIP IN LAKE COMMUNITIES BETWEEN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AND SPECIES RICHNESS
Dodson, S. I., Arnott, S. E., & Cottingham, K. L. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2662:trilcb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 577
The effect of changes in the nutrient income on the condition of Lake Washington1
Edmondson, W. T., & Lehman, J. T. (1981) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1981.26.1.0001 · Cited by 349
Nitrogen and phosphorus limitation and the management of small productive lakes
Maberly, S. C., Pitt, J.-A., Davies, P. S., & Carvalho, L. (2020) · Inland Waters · doi:10.1080/20442041.2020.1714384 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Schindler, D. W., Fee, E. J., & Ruszczynski, T.
- Venue
- Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1978-02-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-196
- ISSN
- 0015-296X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970254498
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus Input and Its Consequences for Phytoplankton Standing Crop and Production in the Experimental Lakes Area and in Similar Lakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f78-031
- The paper
- Schindler, D. W., Fee, E. J., & Ruszczynski, T. (1978). Phosphorus Input and Its Consequences for Phytoplankton Standing Crop and Production in the Experimental Lakes Area and in Similar Lakes. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. https://doi.org/10.1139/f78-031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.