The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pathways and Mechanisms for Removal of Dissolved Organic Carbon from Leaf Leachate in Streams
Abstract
Removal of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from water resulting from adsorption and microbial uptake was examined to determine the importance of biotic and abiotic pathways. Physical–chemical adsorption to components of the stream sediment or water and biotic assimilation associated with the microbial population was determined in recirculating chambers utilizing leachate from alder (Alnus rubra). Adsorptive mechanisms were further separated into interactions involving (1) specific clay minerals, (2) amorphous solid phases of hydrous aluminum and iron oxides, and (3) fine particulate organic matter. Physical–chemical adsorptive mechanisms for alder leachate removal exhibited rapid kinetic equilibration between the DOC and solid phases, but only a specific fraction of the DOC, likely containing certain chemical functional groups, was adsorbed. The amorphous aluminum and iron oxides possessed a much higher potential capacity than the clay minerals or fine particulate organics for DOC adsorption. Microbial uptake of DOC from the alder leachate was kinetically slower than adsorptive uptake. However, microbial activity was overall much more effective in the removal and degradation of the total DOC pool leached from alder leaves. Over a 48-h period, 97% of added 14 C labeled leachate was removed from solution by adsorption (~ 20%) and microbial utilization (~ 77%). The rate of microbial uptake was 45 μg C/g sediment C∙h−1 or 14 mg C∙m−2∙h−1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian Zones
Gregory, S. V., Swanson, F. J., McKee, W. A., & Cummins, K. W. (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311607 · Cited by 2,460
A review of allochthonous organic matter dynamics and metabolism in streams
Tank, J. L., Rosi-Marshall, E. J., Griffiths, N. A., Entrekin, S. A., & Stephen, M. L. (2010) · Journal of the North American Benthological Society · doi:10.1899/08-170.1 · Cited by 760
Dissolved Organic Carbon in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Synthesis and a Model
Neff, J. C., & Asner, G. P. (2001) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100210000058 · Cited by 734
Interbiome Comparison of Stream Ecosystem Dynamics
Minshall, G. W., Petersen, R. C., Cummins, K. W., Bott, T. L., Sedell, J. R., Cushing, C. E., & Vannote, R. L. (1983) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942585 · Cited by 676
A review of the export of carbon in river water: Fluxes and processes
Hope, D., Billett, M. F., & Cresser, M. S. (1994) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/0269-7491(94)90142-2 · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahm, C. N.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1981-01-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-76
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2032440508
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathways and Mechanisms for Removal of Dissolved Organic Carbon from Leaf Leachate in Streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f81-009
- The paper
- Dahm, C. N. (1981). Pathways and Mechanisms for Removal of Dissolved Organic Carbon from Leaf Leachate in Streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f81-009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.