The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of Disease Incidence in Fish Populations
Abstract
A method is described to estimate the disease incidence in large populations of fish where the material analyzed is composed of a number of pooled individuals. A procedure for calculating a confidence interval estimate is presented, and the bias of the estimate discussed. The methods were developed for estimating disease incidence in hatchery populations of juvenile Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), but are applicable to any situation in which the sampling plan can be assumed to follow the binomial distribution.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collection techniques for the analyses of pathogens in crustaceans
Shields, J. D. (2017) · Journal of Crustacean Biology · doi:10.1093/jcbiol/rux077 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Worlund, D. D., & Taylor, G.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1983-12-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2194-2197
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2034618271
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- disease incidence estimation, confidence intervals, estimation bias, binomial distribution, hatchery populations, juvenile salmon, Oncorhynchus, fish disease surveillance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
