Microstructure of fish otoliths
Abstract
Otolith microstructure examination has found an increasing number of applications in recent years. However, few workers have critically assessed the assumptions upon which the age and growth inferences are based or considered the potential for environmental modification of microstructural features. This paper reviews present applications and their assumptions and suggests future directions. Particular attention is given to the premises that the frequency of increment formation is constant and that the width of increments is proportional to fish growth. A hypothesis of increment formation is presented which appears consistent with the numerous and often conflicting studies reported to date. The presence of an endogenous circadian rhythm of increment formation is invoked, entrained by photoperiod, but susceptible to modification by other cyclic environmental variables. Increments formed as a result of the circadian rhythm (once per 24 h) may be induced by different processes than those induced through the action of environmental cues (often > 1 per 24 h), thus explaining apparent morphological differences in increment structure noted by some workers. Temperature fluctuations appear to be a primary source of subdaily increments and are a potential source of error in otolith interpretation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To use otolith growth as a proxy for juvenile Chinook salmon growth, there must be a strong relationship between fish size and otolith size.
“To use otolith growth as a proxy for juvenile Chinook salmon growth, there must be a strong relationship between fish size and otolith size [47].”
From Estimating Common Growth Patterns in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Diverse Genetic Stocks and a Large Spatial Extent (2016) · cites this paper as [47]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors determining δ13C and δ18O fractionation in aragonitic otoliths of marine fish
Thorrold, S. R., Campana, S. E., Jones, C. M., & Swart, P. K. (1997) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00141-5 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Self-citationMurua, H., Rodriguez-Marin, E., Neilson, J. D., Farley, J. H., & Juan-Jordá, M. J. (2017) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-017-9474-1 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationGoertler, P. A. L., Scheuerell, M. D., Simenstad, C. A., & Bottom, D. L. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162121 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Campana, S. E., & Neilson, J. D.
- ORCID
- Campana, Steven E.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1985-05-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1014-1032
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2036081018
- Cited by
- 1,411
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 51
- FWCI
- 25.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
- Keywords
- fish otoliths, otolith microstructure, otolith growth increments, fish age determination, fish growth, circadian rhythm, photoperiod, temperature fluctuations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review