The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutrient Enrichment Studies in a Coastal Plain Estuary: Phytoplankton Growth in Large-Scale, Continuous Cultures
Abstract
The response of phytoplanktonic growth to experimental nutrient addition in a tributary of the Chesapeake Bay estuary varied with season and nutrient availability. In bioassay experiments employing outdoor 0.5-m 3 continuous cultures freshly inoculated with natural phytoplankton from the Patuxent River estuary, supplements of N, either as ammonium or nitrate, enhanced growth greatly during the low-flow, late-summer season — a period when N:P ratios of dissolved inorganic nutrient standing stocks are characteristically below 5:1 (by atoms). Growth response to N addition was very rapid (1 d after the start of an experiment), implying that phytoplankton in the bioassay were N limited when removed from the estuary. PO 43− addition enhanced phytoplankton growth during the late-winter, high-flow season, when N: P ratios (as previous) typically exceed 90:1 (by atoms), but the response lagged enrichment by at least 4 d and biomass levels achieved in these cultures were less than one third of those achieved in the N-enriched cultures during the late summer. The great seasonal variability in river flow, nutrient regimes, and the response of natural phytoplankton assemblages to nutrient enrichment in the Patuxent, and similar estuaries, suggest that management strategies to improve "water quality" will need to consider N as well as P additions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions.
Kemp, W., Boynton, W., Adolf, J., Boesch, D., Boicourt, W., Brush, G., Cornwell, J., Fisher, T., Glibert, P., Hagy, J., et al. (2005) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps303001 · Cited by 1,468
Self-citationPaerl, H. W. (1997) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1997.42.5_part_2.1154 · Cited by 837
Technical Report: Human Alteration of the Global Nitrogen Cycle: Sources and Consequences
Vitousek, P. M., Aber, J. D., Howarth, R. W., Likens, G. E., Matson, P. A., Schindler, D. W., Schlesinger, W. H., & Tilman, D. G. (1997) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/2269431 · Cited by 561
Influence of Sulfide Inhibition of Nitrification on Nitrogen Regeneration in Sediments
Joye, S. B., & Hollibaugh, J. T. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5236.623 · Cited by 466
Phytoplankton, nutrients, and turbidity in the Chesapeake, Delaware, and Hudson estuaries
Fisher, T. R., Harding, L. W., Stanley, D. W., & Ward, L. G. (1988) · Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/0272-7714(88)90032-7 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Elia, C. F., Sanders, J. G., & Boynton, W. R.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1986-02-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 397-406
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2073838450
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient Enrichment Studies in a Coastal Plain Estuary: Phytoplankton Growth in Large-Scale, Continuous Cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f86-050
- The paper
- D'Elia, C. F., Sanders, J. G., & Boynton, W. R. (1986). Nutrient Enrichment Studies in a Coastal Plain Estuary: Phytoplankton Growth in Large-Scale, Continuous Cultures. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f86-050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.