The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trophic Relationships in Freshwater Pelagic Ecosystems
Abstract
Relative impacts of bottom-up (producer controlled) and top-down (consumer controlled) forces on the biomass and size structure of five major components of freshwater pelagic systems (piscivores, planktivores, zooplankton, phytoplankton, and total phosphorus availability) were estimated. Predictions that emerge are (1) maximum biomass at each trophic level is controlled from below (bottom-up) by nutrient availability, (2) this bottom-up regulation is strongest at the bottom of the food web (i.e. phosphorus → phytoplankton) and weakens by a factor of 2 with each succeeding step up the food web, (3) as energy moves up a food web, the predictability of bottom-up interactions decreases, (4) near the top of the food web, top-down (predator mediated) interactions are strong and have low coefficients of variation, but weaken with every step down the food web, (5) variability around the bottom-up regressions can always be explained by top-down forces, and (6) interplay between top-down and bottom-up effects changes with the trophic status of lakes. In eutrophic lakes, top-down effects are strong for piscivore → zooplankton, weaker for planktivore → zooplankton, and have little impact for zooplankton → phytoplankton. For oligotrophic lakes, the model predicts that top-down effects are not strongly buffered, so that zooplankton → phytoplankton interactions are significant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cascading Trophic Interactions and Lake Productivity
Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F., & Hodgson, J. R. (1985) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1309989 · Cited by 2,646
Cited by
Macroalgal blooms in shallow estuaries: Controls and ecophysiological and ecosystem consequences
Valiela, I., McClelland, J., Hauxwell, J., Behr, P. J., Hersh, D., & Foreman, K. (1997) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1997.42.5_part_2.1105 · Cited by 1,337
A Comprehensive Review on Water Quality Parameters Estimation Using Remote Sensing Techniques
Gholizadeh, M., Melesse, A., & Reddi, L. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16081298 · Cited by 1,122
Magnitude and patterns of herbivory in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems
Cyr, H., & Pace, M. L. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361148a0 · Cited by 528
Mesocosm Experiments as a Tool for Ecological Climate-Change Research
Stewart, R. I. A., Dossena, M., Bohan, D. A., Jeppesen, E., Kordas, R. L., Ledger, M. E., Meerhoff, M., Moss, B., Mulder, C., Shurin, J. B., et al. (2013) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417199-2.00002-1 · Cited by 387
Turner, A. M., & Mittelbach, G. G. (1990) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1938636 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- McQueen, D. J., Post, J. R., & Mills, E. L.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1986-08-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1571-1581
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2036540241
- Cited by
- 1,015
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trophic Relationships in Freshwater Pelagic Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f86-195
- The paper
- McQueen, D. J., Post, J. R., & Mills, E. L. (1986). Trophic Relationships in Freshwater Pelagic Ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f86-195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.