The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental Designs for Estimating Transient Responses to Management Disturbances
Abstract
Simple experimental designs invoking treated and control areas, with all treatments initiated at the same time, should not be used to assess transient responses to management actions or environmental disturbances. Such designs will not properly control for "time–treatment" interactions, involving differential responses of treated areas to nonrandom trends in the experimental environment. For example, survival trends for hatchery salmon stocks cannot be simply compared with survival trends in wild stocks, since the hatchery stocks may be more susceptible to changes in environmental factors such as ocean temperature. To control for such time–treatment interactions, it is suggested to use a "staircase" experimental design in which treatment is initiated at different times on the treated areas. Computation of the average transient and interaction response parameters for such designs, while correcting for temporal trends and inherent differences among areas, can be done using general linear models. The optimum design configuration (number of treated versus control areas, number of pretreatment control times, etc.) involves spreading the treatment starts widely over time and using relatively few control areas.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One approach is to use an experimental design as part of the restoration, such as a staircase model (Walters et al. 1988;Bouwes et al. 2016) that would deliberately complete the restoration in stages such that environmental changes are separable from restoration effects.”
From Adaptive Management in Practice and the Problem of Application at Multiple Scales—Insights from Oyster Reef Restoration on Florida’s Gulf Coast (2022) · cites this paper as Walters et al. 1988
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pine, W. E., Johnson, F. A., Frederick, P. C., & Coggins, L. G. (2022) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1002/mcf2.10192 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Walters, C. J., Collie, J. S., & Webb, T.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1988-03-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 530-538
- ISSN
- 0706-652X
- 1205-7533
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review