Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phosphorus and Nitrogen Limitation of Phytoplankton Growth in the Freshwaters of North America: A Review and Critique of Experimental Enrichments

Elser, James J., Marzolf, Erich R., Goldman, Charles R.·1990·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

While phosphorus is generally considered to be the primary nutrient limiting algal growth in lakes, limitation of algal growth by nitrogen has been observed in freshwater. It is also commonly observed that the most pronounced phytoplankton responses to enrichment occur when both N and P are added together. This led us to re-evaluate nitrogen's status as a secondary nutrient in freshwater through a systematic literature search. In our survey of enrichment bioassays, we found considerable deficiencies in the degree to which investigators have applied sufficient replication, performed and reported statistical tests, and assessed seasonal and spatial differences in algal nutrient limitation. Given these limitations, however, we found that combined N + P enrichment enhanced algal growth much more frequently and more substantially than did addition of N or P singly. On average, the frequency and degree of algal response did not differ for P vs. N enrichment. From our review of whole-lake fertilizations, we concluded that the roles of N and P in constraining algal growth at the whole-lake scale have not been completely separated. However, examination of the distribution between treatments (+N, +P, +N, and P) of lake-years in which substantial algal growth response occurred indicated that combined N and P enrichment was required to consistently produce substantial algal growth response. A more important role than has previously been recognized for N as a limiting nutrient in freshwaters is indicated. We suggest that greater attention should be given to both P and N in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f90-165

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Elser, J. J., Marzolf, E. R., & Goldman, C. R.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
1990-07-01
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
1468-1477
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W2129718584
Cited by
657
References
7
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus and Nitrogen Limitation of Phytoplankton Growth in the Freshwaters of North America: A Review and Critique of Experimental Enrichments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f90-165
The paper
Elser, J. J., Marzolf, E. R., & Goldman, C. R. (1990). Phosphorus and Nitrogen Limitation of Phytoplankton Growth in the Freshwaters of North America: A Review and Critique of Experimental Enrichments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f90-165

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.