Cited by 117Mercury impact and mitigation studiesMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology

Sites of Methyl Mercury Production in Remote Canadian Shield

Ramlal, P. S., Kelly, C. A., Rudd, J. W. M., Furutani, A.·1993·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

Methylation and demethylation of mercury were studied in sediments and surface waters of several remote lakes on the Canadian Shield. Radiochemical assays of mercury methylating activity, which peaked during summer, were 20–40 times faster in epilimnetic than in hypolimnetic sediments. Demethylation rates were usually highest during winter and in hypolimnetic sediments. Epilimnetic sediments were capable of producing methyl mercury 20–40 times faster than hypolimnetic sediments sampled at the same time, with methylating activity peaking during the warm summer months. Because of the opposite pattern of methylating and demethylating activity and because epilimnetic sediments often constitute most of the surface area of these lakes, most of the net methylation (M/D) occurred in the epilimnion of the lakes during summer. Mercury methylation rates were not related to average sediment mercury concentrations, or directly to rates of microbial activity (decomposition) in sediments. It appeared that increasing temperature was an important controlling factor that stimulated methylation but retarded demethylation. Specific methylation rates, M/D, and the measured concentration of methyl mercury in the surface waters of the lakes all peaked during midsummer, suggesting that the radiochemical assays used reflected changes in the relative activities of natural methylating and demethylating microorganisms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f93-112

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher temperatures of the hypolimnion that would accompany increased mixing from aeration/oxygenation could increase methylation rates.

    “Additionally, higher temperatures of the hypolimnion that would accompany increased mixing from aeration/oxygenation could increase methylation rates (Bodaly et al. 1993, Ramlal et al. 1993).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 15 · Cited by 117

Authors
Ramlal, P. S., Kelly, C. A., Rudd, J. W. M., & Furutani, A.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
1993-05-01
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
972-979
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W1992079661
Cited by
117
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Keywords
mercury methylation, mercury demethylation, lake sediments, epilimnion, hypolimnion, seasonal variation, temperature effects, remote lakes, Canadian Shield, radiochemical assay, microbial activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review