Sites of Methyl Mercury Production in Remote Canadian Shield
Abstract
Methylation and demethylation of mercury were studied in sediments and surface waters of several remote lakes on the Canadian Shield. Radiochemical assays of mercury methylating activity, which peaked during summer, were 20–40 times faster in epilimnetic than in hypolimnetic sediments. Demethylation rates were usually highest during winter and in hypolimnetic sediments. Epilimnetic sediments were capable of producing methyl mercury 20–40 times faster than hypolimnetic sediments sampled at the same time, with methylating activity peaking during the warm summer months. Because of the opposite pattern of methylating and demethylating activity and because epilimnetic sediments often constitute most of the surface area of these lakes, most of the net methylation (M/D) occurred in the epilimnion of the lakes during summer. Mercury methylation rates were not related to average sediment mercury concentrations, or directly to rates of microbial activity (decomposition) in sediments. It appeared that increasing temperature was an important controlling factor that stimulated methylation but retarded demethylation. Specific methylation rates, M/D, and the measured concentration of methyl mercury in the surface waters of the lakes all peaked during midsummer, suggesting that the radiochemical assays used reflected changes in the relative activities of natural methylating and demethylating microorganisms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher temperatures of the hypolimnion that would accompany increased mixing from aeration/oxygenation could increase methylation rates.
“Additionally, higher temperatures of the hypolimnion that would accompany increased mixing from aeration/oxygenation could increase methylation rates (Bodaly et al. 1993, Ramlal et al. 1993).”
From Implications of redox processes for the rehabilitation of an urban lake, Onondaga Lake, New York (2008) · cites this paper as Ramlal et al. 1993
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 15 · Cited by 117
- Authors
- Ramlal, P. S., Kelly, C. A., Rudd, J. W. M., & Furutani, A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1993-05-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 972-979
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W1992079661
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
- Keywords
- mercury methylation, mercury demethylation, lake sediments, epilimnion, hypolimnion, seasonal variation, temperature effects, remote lakes, Canadian Shield, radiochemical assay, microbial activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review