Cited by 256Mercury impact and mitigation studiesEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Mercury Concentrations in Fish Related to Size of Remote Canadian Shield Lakes

Bodaly, R. A., Rudd, J. W. M., Fudge, R. J. P., Kelly, C. A.·1993·Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Abstract

Mercury concentrations in planktivorous, omnivorous, and piscivorous fishes were inversely related to lake size in six lakes in northwestern Ontario. The lakes were remote from direct anthropogenic influences and ranged in surface area from 89 to 35 000 ha. Fish mercury concentrations were not related to ratios of drainage basin area to lake size, to ratios of epilimnetic area to lake size, to lake alkalinity, or to the concentration of mercury in lake sediments. Rates of mercury methylation (M) were positively dependent on water temperature whereas rates of methyl mercury demethylation (D) were inversely related to temperature. Thus, M/D was strongly temperature dependent. Mercury concentrations in four fish species were significantly positively correlated with mean epilimnetic water temperatures (r2's ranged from 0.66 to 0.88). This suggested that higher water temperatures in smaller lakes during the open-water season influenced M/D ratios and were the cause of higher fish mercury levels. No lake size related variation was observed in the mercury concentrations in benthivorous fishes. Our hypothesis that epilimnetic temperature affects mercury concentrations in fish deserves further attention, given the possible effects of climate warming on mercury contamination of fishery resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/f93-113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher temperatures of the hypolimnion that would accompany increased mixing from aeration/oxygenation could increase methylation rates.

    “Additionally, higher temperatures of the hypolimnion that would accompany increased mixing from aeration/oxygenation could increase methylation rates (Bodaly et al. 1993, Ramlal et al. 1993).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 256

Authors
Bodaly, R. A., Rudd, J. W. M., Fudge, R. J. P., & Kelly, C. A.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
Published
1993-05-01
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
980-987
ISSN
  • 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
  • 1205-7533
OpenAlex
W1987360570
Cited by
256
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
lake size, mercury methylation, global warming, Canadian Shield lakes, benthivorous fish, remote lakes, northwestern Ontario

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review