The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mercury in Sediments and Sediment Pore Water in the Laurentian Trough
Abstract
The concentration of dissolved mercury in the pore water of Laurentian Trough sediments varies between the detection limit (2.5 pM) and 64 pM, up to an order of magnitude enriched relative to the overlying water. Dissolved mercury is low near the sediment surface, increases with depth to 5 cm, and then decreases with further depth. Redistribution of remobilized mercury within the sediment column is, however, insufficient to explain the observed depth variations in mercury concentration. In the Lower St. Lawrence Estuary, the vertical profiles of mercury in trough sediments tend to be consistent with the chronology of mercury discharges from chlor-alkali plants located in the St. Lawrence drainage basin. The total amount of anthropogenic mercury in sediments deposited below the 200-m isobath in the entire lower St. Lawrence Estuary since the beginning of industrialization is estimated as 170 ± 85 × 10 3 kg, about six times the amount of natural mercury that has accumulated during the same period. Near the seaward end of the Trough in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, sedimentary mercury concentrations are much lower than in the Estuary, with a significant portion of the anthropogenic mercury deposited in the sediments probably coming from the atmosphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals
Tessier, A., Campbell, P. G. C., & Bisson, M. (1979) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50043a017 · Cited by 12,052
Froelich, P. N., Klinkhammer, G. P., Bender, M. L., Luedtke, N. A., Heath, G. R., Cullen, D., Dauphin, P., Hammond, D., Hartman, B., & Maynard, V. (1979) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(79)90095-4 · Cited by 3,368
Cited by
Geochemistry of Mercury in the Environment
Fitzgerald, W. F., & Lamborg, C. H. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.00904-9 · Cited by 275
Recent Declines in Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in the Upper Midwest
Engstrom, D. R., & Swain, E. B. (1997) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es9600892 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Gobeil, C., & Cossa, D.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1993-08-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1794-1800
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2087016984
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mercury in Sediments and Sediment Pore Water in the Laurentian Trough. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f93-201
- The paper
- Gobeil, C., & Cossa, D. (1993). Mercury in Sediments and Sediment Pore Water in the Laurentian Trough. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f93-201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.