The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationships between Common Biological Reference Points Used as Thresholds and Targets of Fisheries Management Strategies
Abstract
Relationships between various biological reference points (BRPs) used to define thresholds and targets of fisheries management strategies were examined for a range of combinations of life history characteristics. Rank orderings of the selected BRPs were strongly influenced by the degree of density dependence in the underlying spawning–recruitment (S–R) relationship. The validity of F 0.1, F max, F 20% (the fishing mortality at which spawning per recruit is 20% of the maximum), and other reference fishing mortality rates as approximations to F msy or as thresholds of overfishing is highly dependent on life history characteristics, particular the degree of density dependence in the S–R relationship. It is recommended that F 40% be adopted as a target fishing mortality rate when the S–R relationship is unknown and that threshold levels of biomass be related to the estimated or assumed degree of density dependence in the S–R relationship. Two new methods of calculating threshold biomass levels are suggested as alternatives to the familiar 20% B 0 rule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rose, K. A., Cowan, J. H., Winemiller, K. O., Myers, R. A., & Hilborn, R. (2001) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1046/j.1467-2960.2001.00056.x · Cited by 696
Intrinsic rebound potentials of 26 species of Pacific sharks
Smith, S. E., Au, D. W., & Show, C. (1999) · Marine and Freshwater Research · doi:10.1071/mf97135 · Cited by 503
Maximum reproductive rate of fish at low population sizes
Myers, R. A., Bowen, K. G., & Barrowman, N. J. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f99-201 · Cited by 503
Armstrong, J., Armstrong, D., & Hilborn, R. (1998) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1023/a:1008891412756 · Cited by 266
Effects of cryptic mortality and the hidden costs of using length limits in fishery management
Coggins, L. G., Catalano, M. J., Allen, M. S., Pine, W. E., & Walters, C. J. (2007) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/j.1467-2679.2007.00247.x · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Mace, P. M.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-122
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2055402323
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationships between Common Biological Reference Points Used as Thresholds and Targets of Fisheries Management Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f94-013
- The paper
- Mace, P. M. (1994). Relationships between Common Biological Reference Points Used as Thresholds and Targets of Fisheries Management Strategies. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.