The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Nutrients and Physical Factors on the Shift from Cyanobacterial to Chlorophyte Dominance in Shallow Danish Lakes
Abstract
Phytoplankton dominance (as biomass) by heterocystous cyanobacteria, nonheterocystous cyanobacteria, and chlorophytes was studied along a trophic gradient (0.011–2.2 mg P∙L−1) by analyzing regularly collected semiquantitative data from 178 shallow Danish lakes (mean depth < 3 m) and quantitative data from 32 lakes. Heterocystous cyanobacteria were dominant at low total P (TP) (< 0.25 mg P∙L−1) and nonheterocystous cyanobacteria at intermediate TP (0.25–0.8 mg P∙L−1), while chlorophytes often were dominant at high TP (> 1 mg P∙L−1). In contrast with many earlier findings, heterocystous cyanobacteria were not dominant at low total N (TN):TP or low inorganic N concentrations; chlorophytes were dominant at extremely high pH, and the shift from cyanobacterial to chlorophyte dominance could not be explained by a change in the photic zone to mixing zone ratio. We suggest that chlorophyte dominance in hypertrophic shallow lakes is attributable to continuous input of nutrients and carbon from the sediment and external sources. This renders the fast-growing chlorophytes a superior competitor compared with the relatively slow-growing cyanobacteria, even when inorganic nutrient concentration is low and pH high. New predictive models relating phytoplankton dominance to TP in shallow lakes were developed, as former models failed to predict our observations satisfactorily.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
The rise of harmful cyanobacteria blooms: the potential roles of eutrophication and climate change
O’Neil, J. M., Davis, T. W., Burford, M. A., & Gobler, C. J. (2012) · Harmful Algae · doi:10.1016/j.hal.2011.10.027 · Cited by 2,225
Jeppesen, E., Jensen, J. P., Søndergaard, M., Lauridsen, T., Pedersen, L. J., & Jensen, L. (1997) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/a:1017046130329 · Cited by 587
Self-citationON THE DOMINANCE OF FILAMENTOUS CYANOBACTERIA IN SHALLOW, TURBID LAKES
Scheffer, M., Rinaldi, S., Gragnani, A., Mur, L. R., & van Nes, E. H. (1997) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0272:otdofc]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 555
Moss, B., Stephen, D., Alvarez, C., Becares, E., Bund, W. V. D., Collings, S. E., Donk, E. V., Eyto, E. D., Feldmann, T., Fernández‐Aláez, C., et al. (2003) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.592 · Cited by 331
Self-citationFang, F., Gao, Y., Gan, L., He, X., & Yang, L. (2018) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-018-1394-5 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, J. P., Jeppesen, E., Olrik, K., & Kristensen, P.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1994-08-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1692-1699
- ISSN
- 0706-652X (ISSN-L)
- 1205-7533
- OpenAlex
- W2071020272
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Nutrients and Physical Factors on the Shift from Cyanobacterial to Chlorophyte Dominance in Shallow Danish Lakes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/f94-170
- The paper
- Jensen, J. P., Jeppesen, E., Olrik, K., & Kristensen, P. (1994). Impact of Nutrients and Physical Factors on the Shift from Cyanobacterial to Chlorophyte Dominance in Shallow Danish Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1139/f94-170
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.