The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative genetic mapping of allotetraploid cotton and its diploid progenitors
Abstract
Allotetraploid cotton species (Gossypium) belong to a 1-2 million year old lineage that reunited diploid genomes that diverged from each other 5-10 million years ago. To characterize genome evolution in the diploids and allotetraploids, comparative RFLP mapping was used to construct genetic maps for the allotetraploids (AD genome; n = 26) and diploids (A and D genomes; n = 13). Comparisons among the 13 suites of homoeologous linkage groups permitted comparisons of synteny and gene order. Two reciprocal translocations were confirmed involving four allotetraploid A t genome chromosomes, as was a translocation between the two extant A genome diploids. Nineteen locus order differences were detected among the two diploid and two allotetraploid genomes. Conservation of colinear linkage groups among the four genomes indicates that allopolyploidy in Gossypium was not accompanied by extensive chromosomal rearrangement. Many inversions include duplicated loci, suggesting that the processes that gave rise to inversions are not fully conservative. Allotetraploid A t and D t genomes and the A and D diploid genomes are recombinationally equivalent despite a nearly two-fold difference in physical size. Polyploidization in Gossypium is associated with enhanced recombination, as genetic lengths for allotetraploid genomes are over 50% greater than those of their diploid counterparts.Key words: restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), Gossypium, evolution, polyploidy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kianian, S. F., & Quiros, C. F. (1992) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00224150 · Cited by 217
Cited by
Genome evolution in polyploids
Wendel, J. F. (2000) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1006392424384 · Cited by 1,600
Self-citationUnravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events
Bowers, J. E., Chapman, B. A., Rong, J., & Paterson, A. H. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01521 · Cited by 1,599
Self-citationThe draft genome of a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii
Wang, K., Wang, Z., Li, F., Ye, W., Wang, J., Song, G., Yue, Z., Cong, L., Shang, H., Zhu, S., et al. (2012) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2371 · Cited by 1,009
Polyploid formation in cotton is not accompanied by rapid genomic changes
Liu, B., Brubaker, C. L., Mergeai, G., Cronn, R. C., & Wendel, J. F. (2001) · Genome · doi:10.1139/g01-011 · Cited by 353
Self-citationRate Variation Among Nuclear Genes and the Age of Polyploidy in Gossypium
Senchina, D. S. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg065 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Brubaker, C. L., Paterson, A. H., & Wendel, J. F.
- Venue
- Genome
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 184-203
- ISSN
- 0831-2796 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3321
- OpenAlex
- W1976694769
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative genetic mapping of allotetraploid cotton and its diploid progenitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/g98-118
- The paper
- Brubaker, C. L., Paterson, A. H., & Wendel, J. F. (1999). Comparative genetic mapping of allotetraploid cotton and its diploid progenitors. Genome. https://doi.org/10.1139/g98-118
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.