Feature selection and dimensionality reduction in multi-omics
Abstract
High-throughput multi-omics technologies generate high-dimensional, heterogeneous and noisy datasets, making robust biomarker discovery and disease modelling challenging. This review critically examines dimensionality reduction and representation strategies for multi-omics analysis while distinguishing three related but different goals: feature selection, feature extraction/representation learning, and multi-omics integration. We use sparse canonical correlation analysis (sCCA), variational autoencoders (VAEs), and graph convolutional networks (GCNs) as representative case studies spanning sparse linear, probabilistic deep-learning, and graph-based approaches. Rather than treating these methods as interchangeable, we compare their data requirements, assumptions, interpretability, ability to accommodate non-linearity and missing modalities, computational demands, and validation needs. Applications across cancer, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disease, and across bulk, single-cell, spatial and imaging multi-omics are summarized in comparative tables. We conclude with practical guidance for matching method families to biological questions and emphasize that robust biomarker claims require leakage-free model development, stability assessment and independent validation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Rai, S., & Kovalchuk, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Lethbridge (CA)
- ORCID
- Kovalchuk, Igor
- Venue
- Genome
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 2026-10-18
- ISSN
- 0831-2796 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3321
- OpenAlex
- W7222885781
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Genome (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Keywords
- multi-omics, feature selection, dimensionality reduction, sparse canonical correlation analysis, variational autoencoder, graph convolutional networks, representation learning, multi-omics integration, biomarker discovery, single-cell omics, spatial omics, model validation, data leakage, missing modalities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review