Cited by 41Exercise and Physiological ResponsesCardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and Training

Quercetin’s effect on cycling efficiency and substrate utilization

Dumke, Charles L., Nieman, David C., Utter, Alan C., Rigby, Michael D., Quindry, John C., Triplett, N. Travis, McAnulty, Steven R., McAnulty, Lisa S.·2009·Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

Previous evidence suggests that quercetin supplementation increases performance in humans. We examined the effects of 3 weeks of quercetin supplementation on fuel utilization, gross efficiency (GE), and perceived effort during 3 h of cycling over 3 successive days. Forty cyclists were randomized into quercetin and placebo groups and tested for maximal oxygen consumption (53.2 +/- 1.2 and 54.7 +/- 1.1 mL.kg(-1).min(-1)). For 3 weeks following maximal oxygen consumption testing, subjects supplemented either 1000 mg.day(-1) quercetin or placebo during normal training. Following supplementation, subjects cycled at 57% maximum power for 3 h, on 3 successive days, using their own bicycles fitted to CompuTrainer Pro Model trainers (RacerMate, Seattle, Wash.). Metabolic measurements were taken every 30 min for each 3-h ride. Muscle biopsies obtained from the vastus lateralis immediately pre-exercise and postexercise on days 1 and 3 were analyzed for muscle glycogen content. Power output remained constant for all 3 exercise trials, but significant decreases over time were measured for GE, cadence, respiratory exchange ratio, blood glucose, and muscle glycogen. Significant increases were measured for heart rate and volume of oxygen consumption over time. No quercetin treatment effect was observed for any of the outcome measures in this study. These data indicate that GE is reduced during an exhausting 3-h bout of exercise. However, quercetin did not significantly affect any outcomes in these already well-trained subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/h09-099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 41

Authors
Dumke, C. L., Nieman, D. C., Utter, A. C., Rigby, M. D., Quindry, J. C., Triplett, N. T., McAnulty, S. R., & McAnulty, L. S.
Affiliations
Appalachian State University (US)
Venue
Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
Published
2009-12
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
993-1000
ISSN
  • 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-5320
OpenAlex
W2119944032
Cited by
41
References
61
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
quercetin, dietary supplementation, cycling performance, gross efficiency, fuel utilization, substrate utilization, respiratory exchange ratio, muscle glycogen, endurance exercise, trained cyclists, perceived exertion, heart rate
MeSH terms
Adult, Bicycling, Biopsy, Blood Glucose, Double-Blind Method, Energy Metabolism, Glycogen, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Endurance, Physical Fitness, Quercetin, Time Factors, Dietary Supplements, Quadriceps Muscle, Muscle Strength, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review