Cited by 120Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Exercise is an effective treatment modality for reducing cancer-related fatigue and improving physical capacity in cancer patients and survivors: a meta-analysis

McMillan, Elliott M., Newhouse, Ian J.·2011·Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

Abstract

The use of exercise interventions to manage cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a rapidly developing field of study. However, results are inconsistent and difficult to interpret across the literature, making it difficult to draw accurate conclusions regarding the true effectiveness of exercise interventions for CRF management. The aims of this study were to apply a meta-analysis to quantitatively assess the effects of exercise intervention strategies on CRF, and to elucidate appropriate exercise prescription guidelines. A systematic search of electronic databases and relevant journals and articles was conducted. Studies were eligible if subjects were over the age of 18 years, if they had been given a diagnosis of or had been treated for cancer, if exercise was used to treat CRF as a primary or secondary endpoint, and if the effects of the intervention were evaluated quantitatively and presented adequate statistical data for analysis. A total of 16 studies, representing 1426 participants (exercise, 759; control, 667) were included in a meta-analysis using a fixed-effects model. The standardized mean difference effect size (SMD) was used to test the effect of exercise on CRF between experimental and control groups. The results indicate a small but significant effect size in favour of the use of exercise interventions for reducing CRF (SMD 0.26, p < 0.001). Furthermore, aerobic exercise programs caused a significant reduction in CRF (SMD 0.21, p < 0.001) and overall, exercise was able to significantly improve aerobic and musculoskeletal fitness compared with control groups (p < 0.01). Further investigation is still required to determine the effects of exercise on potential underlying mechanisms related to the pathophysiology of CRF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/h11-082

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 120

Authors
McMillan, E. M., & Newhouse, I. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Lakehead University (CA)
Venue
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Published
2011-12
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
892-903
ISSN
  • 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-5320
OpenAlex
W2089072257
Cited by
120
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer-related fatigue, exercise intervention, aerobic exercise, physical capacity, cancer survivors, cancer patients, musculoskeletal fitness, exercise prescription, fatigue management
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal System, Neoplasms, Physical Fitness, Exercise, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Survivors, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review