Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil

Babiuk, L. A., Paul, E. A.·1970·Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Abstract

Quantitative recoveries of bacteria added to a number of soils were obtained using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) as a stain. Enzyme fluorescence, using fluorescein diacetate or dibutyrate, could not be adapted for the routine counting of metabolizing organisms in soil. Staining with rose bengal gave recoveries of 60–80%.Soil-extract dilution plates revealed 4 × 10 7 bacteria/g in the 0–10 cm layer in April and 27 × 10 7 in October. One-third of this number was observed in the 20–30 cm layer. Actinomycete colonies added another 20% to the counts at the 0–30 cm depth but constituted 70% of the total colonies from the 90–120 cm depth. Microscopic counts indicated 2.2–4.6 × 10 9 organisms/g of surface soil. The number of bacteria decreased in a linear fashion with depth but no relation was found between the numbers obtained by direct microscopy and those by plate counting. However, each of the methods showed a high relationship between the size of the bacterial population present at each depth on the different sampling dates.The observed bacteria, actinomycete spores, and hyphal segments averaged 0.6 × 1 μ. On this basis, the biomass in the top 30 cm, as determined by direct microscopy, ranged from 30 to 76 g/m 2 (dry weight basis). This implies, considering the amount of available energy, that the individual cells have enough energy to divide only a few times each year. Direct microscopic counting yields a quantitative picture of the organisms present but cannot separate between inactive cells, spores, and metabolizing organisms. Data from plate counts probably give a truer indication of metabolically active cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/m70-011

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Babiuk, L. A., & Paul, E. A.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
Published
1970-02-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
57-62
ISSN
  • 0008-4166 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3275
OpenAlex
W2149588264
Cited by
299
References
2
FWCI
12.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/m70-011
The paper
Babiuk, L. A., & Paul, E. A. (1970). The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1139/m70-011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.