The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil
Abstract
Quantitative recoveries of bacteria added to a number of soils were obtained using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) as a stain. Enzyme fluorescence, using fluorescein diacetate or dibutyrate, could not be adapted for the routine counting of metabolizing organisms in soil. Staining with rose bengal gave recoveries of 60–80%.Soil-extract dilution plates revealed 4 × 10 7 bacteria/g in the 0–10 cm layer in April and 27 × 10 7 in October. One-third of this number was observed in the 20–30 cm layer. Actinomycete colonies added another 20% to the counts at the 0–30 cm depth but constituted 70% of the total colonies from the 90–120 cm depth. Microscopic counts indicated 2.2–4.6 × 10 9 organisms/g of surface soil. The number of bacteria decreased in a linear fashion with depth but no relation was found between the numbers obtained by direct microscopy and those by plate counting. However, each of the methods showed a high relationship between the size of the bacterial population present at each depth on the different sampling dates.The observed bacteria, actinomycete spores, and hyphal segments averaged 0.6 × 1 μ. On this basis, the biomass in the top 30 cm, as determined by direct microscopy, ranged from 30 to 76 g/m 2 (dry weight basis). This implies, considering the amount of available energy, that the individual cells have enough energy to divide only a few times each year. Direct microscopic counting yields a quantitative picture of the organisms present but cannot separate between inactive cells, spores, and metabolizing organisms. Data from plate counts probably give a truer indication of metabolically active cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENT OF ESCHERICHIA COLI
Marr, A. G., Nilson, E. H., & Clark, D. J. (1963) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1963.tb13659.x · Cited by 273
Nitrogen fixation in grassland and associated cultivated ecosystems
Paul, E. A., Myers, R. J. K., & Rice, W. A. (1971) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf02661874 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Cited by
Microbial and Faunal Interactions and Effects on Litter Nitrogen and Decomposition in Agroecosystems
Beare, M. H., Parmelee, R. W., Hendrix, P. F., Cheng, W., Coleman, D. C., & Crossley, D. A. (1992) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937317 · Cited by 641
Plant Production and Soil Microorganisms in Late‐Successional Ecosystems: A Continental‐Scale Study
Zak, D. R., Tilman, D., Parmenter, R. R., Rice, C. W., Fisher, F. M., Vose, J., Milchunas, D., & Martin, C. W. (1994) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940888 · Cited by 384
2 Direct Methods and Biomass Estimation
Fry, J. C. (1990) · Methods in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0580-9517(08)70239-3 · Cited by 314
Modelling C and N turnover through the microbial biomass in soil
Van Veen, J. A., Ladd, J. N., & Frissel, M. J. (1984) · Biological Processes and Soil Fertility · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-6101-2_23 · Cited by 301
Beare, M. H., Hu, S., Coleman, D. C., & Hendrix, P. F. (1997) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(96)00142-4 · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Babiuk, L. A., & Paul, E. A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Microbiology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1970-02-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 57-62
- ISSN
- 0008-4166 (ISSN-L)
- 1480-3275
- OpenAlex
- W2149588264
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/m70-011
- The paper
- Babiuk, L. A., & Paul, E. A. (1970). The use of fluorescein isothiocyanate in the determination of the bacterial biomass of grassland soil. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1139/m70-011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.