Cited by 36Plant and Fungal Interactions ResearchFungal and yeast genetics researchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mutual antagonism among killer yeasts: competition between Kl and K2 killers and a novel cDNA-based K1-K2 killer strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Bussey, Howard, Vernet, Thierry, Sdicu, Anne-Marie·1988·Canadian Journal of Microbiology

Abstract

Mutually antagonistic K1 and K2 killer strains compete when mixed and serially subcultured. At pH 4.6, where the K1 killer toxin is more stable in vitro, the K1 strain outcompeted the K2 strains at both 18 and 30 °C. At pH 4.0, closer to the in vitro pH optimum of the K2 killer toxin, the K1 strain again predominated at 18 °C, but at 30 °C the K2 strains became the sole cell type on subculture. To show more clearly that these results were dependent upon the respective killer toxins, control experiments were conducted with isogenic, nonkiller strains cured of the dsRNA-based killer virions. Such nonkiller strains were unable to compete with antagonistic killers under conditions where their isogenic killer parents could, strongly suggesting that the killer phenotype was important in these competitions. Double K1–K2 killer strains cannot stably exist, as their dsRNA genomes compete at a replicative level. Using recombinant DNA methodology, a stable K1–K2 killer strain was constructed. This strain outcompeted both K1 and K2 killers when serially subcultured under conditions where either the K1 or the K2 strains would normally predominate in mixed cultures. Such a double killer may be useful in commercial fermentations, where there is a risk of contamination by killer yeasts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/m88-007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Besides the engineering examples, only killer toxin activity has been extensively studied and transferred to new strains, mainly for biotechnological applications.

    “Besides this, only killer toxin activity has been extensively studied and transferred to new strains; mainly for biotechnological applications (Bajaj and Sharma 2010; Bussey et al. 1988; Schmitt and Schernikau 1997).”

    From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Bussey et al. 1988

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bussey, H., Vernet, T., & Sdicu, A.-M.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Microbiology
Published
1988-01-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
38-44
ISSN
  • 0008-4166 (ISSN-L)
  • 1480-3275
OpenAlex
W2072450861
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › Plant and Fungal Interactions Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
killer yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, killer toxin, interspecific competition, mutual antagonism, pH optimum, temperature effects, serial subculture
MeSH terms
DNA, DNA, Recombinant, Genes, Fungal, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Mycotoxins, Phenotype, Plasmids, RNA, Double-Stranded, RNA, Fungal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transformation, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review