The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probing transmembrane mechanical coupling and cytomechanics using magnetic twisting cytometry
Abstract
We recently developed a magnetic twisting cytometry technique that allows us to apply controlled mechanical stresses to specific cell surface receptors using ligand-coated ferromagnetic microbeads and to simultaneously measure the mechanical response in living cells. Using this technique, we have previously shown the following: (i) β1 integrin receptors mediate mechanical force transfer across the cell surface and to the cytoskeleton, whereas other transmembrane receptors (e.g., scavenger receptors) do not; (ii) cytoskeletal stiffness increases in direct proportion to the level of stress applied to integrins; and (iii) the slope of this linear stiffening response differs depending on the shape of the cell. We now show that different integrins (β1, αVβ3, αV, α5, α2) and other transmembrane receptors (scavenger receptor, platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule) differ in their ability to mediate force transfer across the cell surface. In addition, the linear stiffening behavior previously observed in endothelial cells was found to be shared by other cell types. Finally, we demonstrate that dynamic changes in cell shape that occur during both cell spreading and retraction are accompanied by coordinate changes in cytoskeletal stiffness. Taken together, these results suggest that the magnetic twisting cytometry technique may be a powerful and versatile tool for studies analyzing the molecular basis of transmembrane mechanical coupling to the cytoskeleton as well as dynamic relations between changes in cytoskeletal structure and alterations in cell form and function.Key words: integrins, mechanical stress, magnetic beads, cytoskeleton, cell shape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role of cell shape in growth control
Folkman, J., & Moscona, A. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/273345a0 · Cited by 2,422
Cited by
Progress in applications of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine
Pankhurst, Q. A., Thanh, N. T. K., Jones, S. K., & Dobson, J. (2009) · Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics · doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001 · Cited by 1,455
Yim, E. K. F., Darling, E. M., Kulangara, K., Guilak, F., & Leong, K. W. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.037 · Cited by 712
Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells
Wang, N., Tolić-Nørrelykke, I. M., Chen, J., Mijailovich, S. M., Butler, J. P., Fredberg, J. J., & Stamenović, D. (2002) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00269.2001 · Cited by 669
Self-citationle Duc, Q., Shi, Q., Blonk, I., Sonnenberg, A., Wang, N., Leckband, D., & de Rooij, J. (2010) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201001149 · Cited by 652
Self-citationCo-regulation of cell adhesion by nanoscale RGD organization and mechanical stimulus
Koo, L. Y., Irvine, D. J., Mayes, A. M., Lauffenburger, D. A., & Griffith, L. G. (2002) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.115.7.1423 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, N., & Ingber, D. E.
- Venue
- Biochemistry and Cell Biology
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1995-07-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 327-335
- ISSN
- 0829-8211 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6002
- OpenAlex
- W2089547011
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probing transmembrane mechanical coupling and cytomechanics using magnetic twisting cytometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1139/o95-041
- The paper
- Wang, N., & Ingber, D. E. (1995). Probing transmembrane mechanical coupling and cytomechanics using magnetic twisting cytometry. Biochemistry and Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1139/o95-041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.