PHOTONEUTRONS IN A HEAVY WATER PILE
Abstract
Decay curves of the neutron intensity in the low power heavy water pile (ZEEP) at Chalk River as a function of time from shutdown with cadmium rods were obtained with three proportional counters of different sensitivities. The range of counting rates spanned, including operation at 50 w., was 8 × 105. The durations of steady operation before shutdown were 10, 50, and 230 min. The mean lifetimes and absolute yields of delayed and photoneutron groups were found by analyzing each decay curve into a sum of decreasing exponentials and using the theory of pile kinetics. The yields were corrected to infinite irradiation time. These results are compared with data obtained by others. The comparison shows that the energetic γ-rays of fission products which produce photoneutrons in the heavy water are absorbed to the extent of about 26% in the heavy water and 74% in the uranium rods. A table of recommended mean lifetimes and absolute yields of delayed and photoneutrons is given for use in the kinetics of heavy water piles such as ZEEP. Some quantitative data on the effects of the control plates and shutoff rods are included.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The contribution of delayed neutrons from photoneutron interactions is approximately 4.5% of the total delayed neutron fraction.
“The contribution of the delayed neutrons from photoneutron interactions is approximately 4.5% of the total fraction.”
From Conversion Preliminary Safety Analysis Report for the NIST Research Reactor (2015) · cites this paper as Johns, 1954
In the D2O-moderated NBSR, the delayed neutron fraction has a non-negligible contribution from photoneutrons through the 2H(γ,n)1H nuclear reaction.
“In the D 2 O-moderated NBSR the delayed neutron fraction has a non-negligible contribution from photoneutrons through the 2 H(γ,n) 1 H nuclear reaction.”
From Conversion Preliminary Safety Analysis Report for the NIST Research Reactor (2015) · cites this paper as Johns, 1954
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conversion Preliminary Safety Analysis Report for the NIST Research Reactor
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), U., Diamond, D., (NNSA), U. N. N. S. A., Baek, J., Hanson, A., Cheng, L.-Y., Brown, N., & Cuadra, A. (2015) · doi:10.2172/1169032 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Johns, M. W., & Sargent, B. W.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- Canadian Science Publishing
- Published
- 1954-02-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-152
- ISSN
- 0008-4204 (ISSN-L)
- 1208-6045
- OpenAlex
- W2100239498
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Nuclear Physics and Applications
- Keywords
- photoneutrons, heavy water reactor, delayed neutrons, neutron yield, fission product gamma rays, reactor kinetics, uranium rods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review